Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision
Introduction: Lateral corpectomy has been considered a minimally invasive surgery, allowing a “transdiaphragmatic approach” at the thoracolumbar junction. This approach allows for a small diaphragmatic incision directly in the retroperitoneal space and the affected vertebra. However, its effectiveness in comparison to a conventional approach remains unclear. Thus, in this present study, we compared the surgical outcomes between conventional diaphragmatic detachment and the transdiaphragmatic approach in patients with vertebral fracture at the thoracolumbar junction. Methods: In total, 31 patients with a vertebral fracture at the thoracolumbar junction (T12-L2) were included in this study: 17 underwent a conventional approach, whereas 14 underwent a transdiaphragmatic approach, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The effectiveness of surgery was evaluated in each category of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). Results: Operative time and estimated blood loss were determined to be significantly shorter in the transdiaphragmatic than in the conventional approach. Perioperative complications were observed in the conventional approach (one atelectasis and one pleural effusion), while no complication was noted in the transdiaphragmatic approach. There were no significant differences in postoperative quality of life as assessed by JOABPEQ in terms of pain-related disorders, lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, social life dysfunction, or psychological disorders between the conventional and transdiaphragmatic approaches. Conclusions: A “transdiaphragmatic approach” using lateral access surgery has been found to be associated with a shorter operative time and less blood loss with fewer complications than the conventional approach. Given that equivalent clinical outcomes were achieved in both conventional and transdiaphragmatic approaches, this “transdiaphragmatic approach” could be useful because of its minimal invasiveness..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:5 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Spine Surgery and Related Research - 5(2021), 6, Seite 405-411 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Hiroaki Nakashima [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
doi.org [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
Complication |
|---|
| doi: |
10.22603/ssrr.2020-0191 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ007616473 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ007616473 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503071929.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0191 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ007616473 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ9887633957de4c1c8138f5e8fa57b984 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a RD1-811 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Hiroaki Nakashima |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Introduction: Lateral corpectomy has been considered a minimally invasive surgery, allowing a “transdiaphragmatic approach” at the thoracolumbar junction. This approach allows for a small diaphragmatic incision directly in the retroperitoneal space and the affected vertebra. However, its effectiveness in comparison to a conventional approach remains unclear. Thus, in this present study, we compared the surgical outcomes between conventional diaphragmatic detachment and the transdiaphragmatic approach in patients with vertebral fracture at the thoracolumbar junction. Methods: In total, 31 patients with a vertebral fracture at the thoracolumbar junction (T12-L2) were included in this study: 17 underwent a conventional approach, whereas 14 underwent a transdiaphragmatic approach, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The effectiveness of surgery was evaluated in each category of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). Results: Operative time and estimated blood loss were determined to be significantly shorter in the transdiaphragmatic than in the conventional approach. Perioperative complications were observed in the conventional approach (one atelectasis and one pleural effusion), while no complication was noted in the transdiaphragmatic approach. There were no significant differences in postoperative quality of life as assessed by JOABPEQ in terms of pain-related disorders, lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, social life dysfunction, or psychological disorders between the conventional and transdiaphragmatic approaches. Conclusions: A “transdiaphragmatic approach” using lateral access surgery has been found to be associated with a shorter operative time and less blood loss with fewer complications than the conventional approach. Given that equivalent clinical outcomes were achieved in both conventional and transdiaphragmatic approaches, this “transdiaphragmatic approach” could be useful because of its minimal invasiveness. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a thoracolumbar junction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a transdiaphragmatic approach | |
| 650 | 4 | |a minimally invasive surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a surgical outcome | |
| 650 | 4 | |a complication | |
| 650 | 4 | |a lateral access surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a fracture | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Surgery | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Tokumi Kanemura |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Kotaro Satake |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Kenyu Ito |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Satoshi Tanaka |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Naoki Segi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Jun Ouchida |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Kei Ando |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Kazuyoshi Kobayashi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Shiro Imagama |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Spine Surgery and Related Research |d The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research, 2018 |g 5(2021), 6, Seite 405-411 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000025267 |x 2432261X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2021 |g number:6 |g pages:405-411 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0191 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/9887633957de4c1c8138f5e8fa57b984 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ssrr/5/6/5_2020-0191/_pdf/-char/en |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2432-261X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 5 |j 2021 |e 6 |h 405-411 | ||