The Impact of and Government Planning and Responses to Pandemics for People with Disability: A Rapid Review
<i<Objective</i<—To collate evidence on (1) the risk of infection for people with disability during infectious disease outbreaks and/or pandemics and (2) government responses and pandemic plans for people with disability. <i<Methods</i<—Through two rapid reviews, relevant peer-reviewed studies and grey literature published from 2002 onwards in the English language were identified. Data were synthesised narratively. <i<Results</i<—Aim 1: Of the 680 studies, two studies were included in the review. No grey literature was eligible for inclusion. The evidence regarding risk was inconclusive. Aim 2: Of the 50 studies, three peer-review studies, along with four government reports were included. The literature largely reported on measures being taken to maximise the prevention of transmission of COVID-19 for the general population, with only a few programs including people with disability. <i<Conclusion</i<—Overall, there is inconclusive evidence on the risk of infection for people with disability during infectious disease outbreaks and/or pandemics and the government preparedness and planning for disease outbreaks and/or pandemics largely exclude people with disability. From a population health perspective, during disease outbreaks and pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic, along with the general population, it is important for governments to include people with disability in their pandemic planning and response..
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:18 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health - 18(2021), 6505, p 6505 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Adyya Gupta [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
doi.org [kostenfrei] |
---|
Themen: |
Disability |
---|
doi: |
10.3390/ijerph18126505 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ005978645 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ005978645 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230309195132.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/ijerph18126505 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ005978645 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ6b9c04f1de184800a3132deff600187d | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 0 | |a Adyya Gupta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Impact of and Government Planning and Responses to Pandemics for People with Disability: A Rapid Review |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a <i<Objective</i<—To collate evidence on (1) the risk of infection for people with disability during infectious disease outbreaks and/or pandemics and (2) government responses and pandemic plans for people with disability. <i<Methods</i<—Through two rapid reviews, relevant peer-reviewed studies and grey literature published from 2002 onwards in the English language were identified. Data were synthesised narratively. <i<Results</i<—Aim 1: Of the 680 studies, two studies were included in the review. No grey literature was eligible for inclusion. The evidence regarding risk was inconclusive. Aim 2: Of the 50 studies, three peer-review studies, along with four government reports were included. The literature largely reported on measures being taken to maximise the prevention of transmission of COVID-19 for the general population, with only a few programs including people with disability. <i<Conclusion</i<—Overall, there is inconclusive evidence on the risk of infection for people with disability during infectious disease outbreaks and/or pandemics and the government preparedness and planning for disease outbreaks and/or pandemics largely exclude people with disability. From a population health perspective, during disease outbreaks and pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic, along with the general population, it is important for governments to include people with disability in their pandemic planning and response. | ||
650 | 4 | |a disability | |
650 | 4 | |a pandemic | |
650 | 4 | |a outbreak | |
650 | 4 | |a response | |
650 | 4 | |a emergency preparedness | |
650 | 4 | |a risk of infection | |
653 | 0 | |a Medicine | |
653 | 0 | |a R | |
700 | 0 | |a Anne Kavanagh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a George Disney |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |d MDPI AG, 2005 |g 18(2021), 6505, p 6505 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000006807 |x 16604601 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2021 |g number:6505, p 6505 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126505 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/6b9c04f1de184800a3132deff600187d |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6505 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 18 |j 2021 |e 6505, p 6505 |