Higher Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound over Chest X-ray for Early Diagnosis of COVID-19 Pneumonia
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic rapidly strained healthcare systems worldwide. The reference standard for diagnosis is a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, but results are not immediate and sensibility is variable. Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound compared to chest X-ray for COVID-19 pneumonia. Design and Setting: A retrospective analysis of symptomatic patients admitted into one primary care centre in Spain between March and September 2020. Method: Patients’ chest X-rays and lung ultrasounds were categorized as normal or pathologic. RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 infection. Pathologic lung ultrasound images were further categorized as showing either local or diffuse interstitial disease. McNemar and Fisher tests were used to compare diagnostic accuracy. Results: Most of the 212 patients presented fever at admission, either as a standalone symptom (37.74% of patients) or together with others (72.17% of patients). The positive predictive value of the lung ultrasound was 90% for the diffuse interstitial pattern and 46.92% for local pattern. The lung ultrasound had a significantly higher sensitivity (82.75%) (<i<p</i< < 0.001), but lower specificity (71%) than the chest X-ray (54.02% and 86%, respectively) (<i<p</i< = 0.008) for identifying interstitial lung disease. Moreover, sensitivity of the lung ultrasound for severe interstitial disease was 100%, and was significantly higher than the chest X-ray (58.33%) (<i<p</i< = 0.002). Conclusion: The lung ultrasound is more accurate than the chest X-ray for identifying patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and it is especially useful for those presenting diffuse interstitial disease..
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:18 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health - 18(2021), 3481, p 3481 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Javier Martínez Redondo [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
doi.org [kostenfrei] |
---|
Themen: |
COVID-19 |
---|
doi: |
10.3390/ijerph18073481 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ004241665 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ004241665 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230503010915.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/ijerph18073481 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ004241665 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ84b1d38e56414626aaa2e9771268cf4e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 0 | |a Javier Martínez Redondo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Higher Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound over Chest X-ray for Early Diagnosis of COVID-19 Pneumonia |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Background: The COVID-19 pandemic rapidly strained healthcare systems worldwide. The reference standard for diagnosis is a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, but results are not immediate and sensibility is variable. Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound compared to chest X-ray for COVID-19 pneumonia. Design and Setting: A retrospective analysis of symptomatic patients admitted into one primary care centre in Spain between March and September 2020. Method: Patients’ chest X-rays and lung ultrasounds were categorized as normal or pathologic. RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 infection. Pathologic lung ultrasound images were further categorized as showing either local or diffuse interstitial disease. McNemar and Fisher tests were used to compare diagnostic accuracy. Results: Most of the 212 patients presented fever at admission, either as a standalone symptom (37.74% of patients) or together with others (72.17% of patients). The positive predictive value of the lung ultrasound was 90% for the diffuse interstitial pattern and 46.92% for local pattern. The lung ultrasound had a significantly higher sensitivity (82.75%) (<i<p</i< < 0.001), but lower specificity (71%) than the chest X-ray (54.02% and 86%, respectively) (<i<p</i< = 0.008) for identifying interstitial lung disease. Moreover, sensitivity of the lung ultrasound for severe interstitial disease was 100%, and was significantly higher than the chest X-ray (58.33%) (<i<p</i< = 0.002). Conclusion: The lung ultrasound is more accurate than the chest X-ray for identifying patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and it is especially useful for those presenting diffuse interstitial disease. | ||
650 | 4 | |a general practice | |
650 | 4 | |a lung ultrasonography | |
650 | 4 | |a thoracic radiography | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
653 | 0 | |a Medicine | |
653 | 0 | |a R | |
700 | 0 | |a Carles Comas Rodríguez |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Jesús Pujol Salud |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Montserrat Crespo Pons |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Cristina García Serrano |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Marta Ortega Bravo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Jose María Palacín Peruga |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |d MDPI AG, 2005 |g 18(2021), 3481, p 3481 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000006807 |x 16604601 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2021 |g number:3481, p 3481 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073481 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/84b1d38e56414626aaa2e9771268cf4e |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3481 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 18 |j 2021 |e 3481, p 3481 |