Evaluating Terrorist and Extremist Reintegration Programming: A Systematic Literature Review
This systematic literature review focuses on the evaluation of programs or interventions designed to deradicalize, disengage, rehabilitate, and/or reintegrate terrorists and/or extremists. Though a robust literature describing such interventions exists, it has long been recognized that more data are needed on the effectiveness of programs designed to facilitate reintegration. Thus, the objective of this review is to present an overview of academic and grey literature on the evaluation of programming designed to facilitate the deradicalization, disengagement, rehabilitation, and/or reintegration of terrorists and/or extremists. Our initial queries yielded 271 seemingly relevant peer-reviewed and grey literature articles, but after a more robust screening we determined that only 37 of those articles directly related to the evaluation of interventions. These articles are presented by evaluation design (e.g., quantitative, qualitative); we also review the evaluation mechanisms (e.g., survey, interviews, note review), study design (e.g., experimental, quasi-experimental), data types (i.e., quantitative or qualitative), and findings. Finally, we include ten articles discussing theory of program evaluation. Though the review is limited to available data (e.g., not including unpublished evaluations or government evaluations), we conclude by discussing the state of program evaluation relating to interventions designed to deradicalize, disengage, rehabilitate, and/or reintegrate terrorists and/or extremists, and offering several recommendations for how to improve evaluation methods and overcome barriers to evaluation..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2022 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal for Deradicalization - (2022), 32, Seite 35-75 |
| Sprache: |
Deutsch ; Englisch ; Französisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Megan K. McBride [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
doaj.org [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
Deradicalization |
|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
|---|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ000832898 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ000832898 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230501195939.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ000832898 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJcb17a5a427a74d5f8a06d6b3a68bab86 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a ger |a eng |a fre | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a JA1-92 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Megan K. McBride |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluating Terrorist and Extremist Reintegration Programming: A Systematic Literature Review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This systematic literature review focuses on the evaluation of programs or interventions designed to deradicalize, disengage, rehabilitate, and/or reintegrate terrorists and/or extremists. Though a robust literature describing such interventions exists, it has long been recognized that more data are needed on the effectiveness of programs designed to facilitate reintegration. Thus, the objective of this review is to present an overview of academic and grey literature on the evaluation of programming designed to facilitate the deradicalization, disengagement, rehabilitation, and/or reintegration of terrorists and/or extremists. Our initial queries yielded 271 seemingly relevant peer-reviewed and grey literature articles, but after a more robust screening we determined that only 37 of those articles directly related to the evaluation of interventions. These articles are presented by evaluation design (e.g., quantitative, qualitative); we also review the evaluation mechanisms (e.g., survey, interviews, note review), study design (e.g., experimental, quasi-experimental), data types (i.e., quantitative or qualitative), and findings. Finally, we include ten articles discussing theory of program evaluation. Though the review is limited to available data (e.g., not including unpublished evaluations or government evaluations), we conclude by discussing the state of program evaluation relating to interventions designed to deradicalize, disengage, rehabilitate, and/or reintegrate terrorists and/or extremists, and offering several recommendations for how to improve evaluation methods and overcome barriers to evaluation. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a systematic literature review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a extremism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a terrorism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a deradicalization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a reintegration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a tertiary prevention | |
| 650 | 4 | |a state of the art | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political science | |
| 653 | 0 | |a J | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political science (General) | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Marley Carroll |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Jessa Mellea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Diána Hughes |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Elena Savoia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal for Deradicalization |d Daniel Koehler, 2015 |g (2022), 32, Seite 35-75 |w (DE-627)DOAJ00004833X |x 23639849 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2022 |g number:32 |g pages:35-75 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/cb17a5a427a74d5f8a06d6b3a68bab86 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/643 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2363-9849 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2022 |e 32 |h 35-75 | ||