Antiseptic Mouthwash / Pre-Procedural Rinse on SARS-CoV-2 Load (COVID-19) : Effect of Antiseptic Mouthwash/Gargling Solutions and Pre-procedural Rinse on SARS-CoV-2 Load (COVID-19)

SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, has affected vulnerable individuals, especially those with comorbidities, and high exposure health care workers (HCWs). Typically, the virus first colonizes in the upper respiratory tract (URT) causing clinical symptoms such as coughing, sore throat, and then is transferred to the lower respiratory tract (LRT) which can lead to severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis, and death, if it is not managed.The World Health Organization (WHO) has presented comprehensive guidelines underscoring personal hygiene measures including respiratory hygiene against SARS, MERS, influenza, and now SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19. While personal protection equipment (PPE), personal hygiene measures, environmental infection control, and physical distancing are crucial in mitigating disease transmission, respiratory hygiene measures do not prevent SARS-CoV-2 colonization in URTs and LRTs of infected individuals (symptomatic and asymptomatic).Experimental and clinical research studies on infections similar to COVID-19 such as SARS, MERS, and H5N1 have shown that using antiseptic mouthwash/gargling solutions, such as products containing chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), polyvinylpyrrolidone iodine (PVP-I), chlorine dioxide (ClO2), cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) can reduce viral load. A randomized controlled trial (N=387) showed efficacy and cost-effectiveness of gargling with water or a product containing PVP-I (3X/day, 20 seconds) on URTIs in healthy volunteers (18-65 years) over 60 days from a societal perspective; in vitro studies have shown that CloSYS, an over the counter mouthwash containing ClO2, was effective on inactivating SARS-CoV as well as disinfecting dental unit waterlines, and biofilm control in ultrasonic dental scaling units. A recent study has shown that CloSYS Ultra Sensitive Oral Rinse reduced the viral load of SARS CoV 2, SARS CoV, and Influenza A H3N2 to a varying extent. The data show that the viral load reduction of SARS CoV 2 by Ultra Sensitive rinse was 10 fold more than the reduction of SARS CoV in 30s. Recently, the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the American Dental Association (ADA) have recommended using a mouthwash containing 1.0-1.5% H2O2 as a pre-procedural rinse before dental treatment to potentially reduce SARS-CoV-2 load; however, no in vivo clinical studies have been conducted to support this claim.The aim of this pilot trial is to evaluate the effect of four over-the-counter antiseptic mouthwash/gargling solutions compared to a control (distilled water) to reduce SARS-CoV-2 load. In addition, study participants will be assessed for the severity of their clinical symptoms during the study period. The 4-week protocol was selected as studies have shown that patients can continue to shed the virus and potentially transmit it to the others for a 2 to 4 week period. An interim analysis is planned when 10 participants per arm (50 total) complete the study using the alpha-spending function with O'Brien-Fleming boundary rule..

Medienart:	Klinische Studie

Erscheinungsjahr:	2023
Erschienen:	2023

Enthalten in:	ClinicalTrials.gov - (2023) vom: 18. Nov. Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2023

Sprache:	Englisch

Links:	Volltext [kostenfrei]

Themen:	610 COVID-19 Coronavirus Infections Pharyngeal Diseases Phase: Phase 2 Recruitment Status: Terminated Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Study Type: Interventional Virus Diseases

Anmerkungen:	Source: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record., First posted: June 1, 2020, Last downloaded: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on November 22, 2023, Last updated: November 22, 2023

Study ID:

NCT04409873 20-30874 R00RG2901

Veröffentlichungen zur Studie:

Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. No abstract available. Meng L, Hua F, Bian Z. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Emerging and Future Challenges for Dental and Oral Medicine. J Dent Res. 2020 May;99(5):481-487. doi: 10.1177/0022034520914246. Epub 2020 Mar 12. Xu J, Li Y, Gan F, Du Y, Yao Y. Salivary Glands: Potential Reservoirs for COVID-19 Asymptomatic Infection. J Dent Res. 2020 Jul;99(8):989. doi: 10.1177/0022034520918518. Epub 2020 Apr 9. No abstract available. Reimer K, Wichelhaus TA, Schafer V, Rudolph P, Kramer A, Wutzler P, Ganzer D, Fleischer W. Antimicrobial effectiveness of povidone-iodine and consequences for new application areas. Dermatology. 2002;204 Suppl 1:114-20. doi: 10.1159/000057738. Nagatake T, Ahmed K, Oishi K. Prevention of respiratory infections by povidone-iodine gargle. Dermatology. 2002;204 Suppl 1:32-6. doi: 10.1159/000057722. Eggers M, Koburger-Janssen T, Eickmann M, Zorn J. In Vitro Bactericidal and Virucidal Efficacy of Povidone-Iodine Gargle/Mouthwash Against Respiratory and Oral Tract Pathogens. Infect Dis Ther. 2018 Jun;7(2):249-259. doi: 10.1007/s40121-018-0200-7. Epub 2018 Apr 9. Sakai M, Shimbo T, Omata K, Takahashi Y, Satomura K, Kitamura T, Kawamura T, Baba H, Yoshihara M, Itoh H; Great Cold Investigators-I. Cost-effectiveness of gargling for the prevention of upper respiratory tract infections. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 16;8:258. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-258. Wang WK, Chen SY, Liu IJ, Chen YC, Chen HL, Yang CF, Chen PJ, Yeh SH, Kao CL, Huang LM, Hsueh PR, Wang JT, Sheng WH, Fang CT, Hung CC, Hsieh SM, Su CP, Chiang WC, Yang JY, Lin JH, Hsieh SC, Hu HP, Chiang YP, Wang JT, Yang PC, Chang SC; SARS Research Group of the National Taiwan University/National Taiwan University Hospital. Detection of SARS-associated coronavirus in throat wash and saliva in early diagnosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Jul;10(7):1213-9. doi: 10.3201/eid1007.031113. Watamoto T, Egusa H, Sawase T, Yatani H. Clinical evaluation of chlorine dioxide for disinfection of dental instruments. Int J Prosthodont. 2013 Nov-Dec;26(6):541-4. doi: 10.11607/ijp.3465. Wirthlin MR, Choi JH, Kye SB. Use of chlorine dioxide mouthrinse as the ultrasonic scaling lavage reduces the viable bacteria in the generated aerosols. J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr. 2006;54(2):35-44. No abstract available. Chen C, Zhang XJ, Wang Y, Zhu LX, Liu J. Waste water disinfection during SARS epidemic for microbiological and toxicological control. Biomed Environ Sci. 2006 Jun;19(3):173-8. Peng X, Xu X, Li Y, Cheng L, Zhou X, Ren B. Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice. Int J Oral Sci. 2020 Mar 3;12(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41368-020-0075-9. Meister TL, Bruggemann Y, Todt D, Conzelmann C, Muller JA, Gross R, Munch J, Krawczyk A, Steinmann J, Steinmann J, Pfaender S, Steinmann E. Virucidal Efficacy of Different Oral Rinses Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 14;222(8):1289-1292. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa471. Erratum In: J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 13;223(3):541. Shewale JG, Ratcliff JL. Overinterpretation of the antiviral results for human coronavirus strain 229E (HCoV-229E) relative to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). J Med Virol. 2021 Apr;93(4):1900-1902. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26722. Epub 2021 Jan 5. No abstract available.

fisyears:
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):	CTG003408329