COVIDNOCHE Trial (HFNO Versus CPAP Helmet) in COVID-19 Pneumonia : High Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Helmet Evaluation: A Randomized Crossover Trial in COVID-19 Pneumonia
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory illness that can cause acute arterial hypoxemia. Treatment with invasive ventilation improves oxygenation yet results in death in over 50% of cases. The high incidence of disease has also reduced resources needed to safely deliver invasive ventilation including mechanical ventilators and intravenous sedation. Non-invasive respiratory support has been shown to be efficacious in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure from other etiologies and has the potential to reduce rates of intubation and the time spent on mechanical ventilation in COVID-19. However, it is unknown which type of support is the most effective, limiting the ability to improve clinical outcomes and appropriately allocate resources. To help guide clinical practice and policy, it is critical to understand the comparative effectiveness of two forms of non-invasive respiratory support used worldwide, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered via a helmet interface and high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO)..
Medienart: |
Klinische Studie |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
ClinicalTrials.gov - (2022) vom: 05. Apr. Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2022 |
---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Links: |
Volltext [kostenfrei] |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Source: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record., First posted: May 11, 2020, Last downloaded: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on April 18, 2022, Last updated: April 20, 2022 |
---|
Study ID: |
NCT04381923 |
---|---|
Veröffentlichungen zur Studie: |
|
fisyears: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
CTG003386856 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | CTG003386856 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230425202257.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210408s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)CTG003386856 | ||
035 | |a (UBBS_Klinische_Studien)NCT04381923 | ||
035 | |a (UBBS_Klinische_Studien)843124 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a COVIDNOCHE Trial (HFNO Versus CPAP Helmet) in COVID-19 Pneumonia |b High Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Helmet Evaluation: A Randomized Crossover Trial in COVID-19 Pneumonia |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Source: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record., First posted: May 11, 2020, Last downloaded: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on April 18, 2022, Last updated: April 20, 2022 | ||
520 | |a Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory illness that can cause acute arterial hypoxemia. Treatment with invasive ventilation improves oxygenation yet results in death in over 50% of cases. The high incidence of disease has also reduced resources needed to safely deliver invasive ventilation including mechanical ventilators and intravenous sedation. Non-invasive respiratory support has been shown to be efficacious in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure from other etiologies and has the potential to reduce rates of intubation and the time spent on mechanical ventilation in COVID-19. However, it is unknown which type of support is the most effective, limiting the ability to improve clinical outcomes and appropriately allocate resources. To help guide clinical practice and policy, it is critical to understand the comparative effectiveness of two forms of non-invasive respiratory support used worldwide, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered via a helmet interface and high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO). | ||
650 | 2 | |a Pneumonia | |
650 | 2 | |a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome | |
650 | 2 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 2 | |a Pneumonia, Viral | |
650 | 2 | |a Respiratory Insufficiency | |
650 | 4 | |a Medical Condition: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, Pneumonia, Viral, COVID | |
650 | 4 | |a Study Type: Interventional | |
650 | 4 | |a Recruitment Status: Withdrawn | |
650 | 4 | |a 610 | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t ClinicalTrials.gov |g (2022) vom: 05. Apr. |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2022 |g day:05 |g month:04 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04381923 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_CTG | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |j 2022 |b 05 |c 04 |