Preventive Versus Curative Treatment of Fluid Overload : Effect of a Systematic Preventive Versus Curative Strategy of Fluid Removal on the Weaning of Mechanical Ventilation

Mechanical ventilation is a cornerstone treatment for critically ill patients that is however associated with complications that may alter the prognosis. A major objective is therefore to separate patients from the ventilator as quickly as possible, but without exposing them to the risk of extubation failure. Pulmonary edema is a frequent cause of extubation failure (up to 60% in recent series) and a positive fluid balance has been identified as an important risk factor for extubation failure.Studies have tested the effect of a conservative strategy regarding the administration of fluids in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. This strategy is associated with an improvement in hemodynamic parameters despite an increase in urine output with a negative fluid balance and a significant weight loss as compared to a liberal strategy. The conservative approach also shows a significant improvement in oxygenation with a nonsignificant trend towards a shorter duration of artificial ventilation and ICU stay. During the specific phase of weaning from mechanical ventilation, a randomized trial (BMW trial) demonstrated that a strategy of fluid removal guided by measurement of the plasmatic B-type natriuretic peptide significantly reduced the duration of weaning. Likewise, the interest of obtaining a negative fluid balance through the administration of diuretics in weaning induced pulmonary edema has been established for decades ("curative depletion").In this context, the hypothesis of the present study is that a preventive and systematic strategy of fluid removal through the use of diuretics initiated just before the weaning phase, as soon as the patients is stabilized would shorten the duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation as compared to a curative strategy of fluid removal, only initiated after a failure of the spontaneous breathing trial associated with weaning induced pulmonary edema.The design of the study will be a randomized (1:1) controlled trial, open label, with 2 arms, to evaluate the superiority of the preventive strategy.The weaning process will be protocolized and similar for the two groups..

Medienart:	Klinische Studie

Erscheinungsjahr:	2024
Erschienen:	2024

Enthalten in:	ClinicalTrials.gov - (2024) vom: 17. Jan. Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024

Sprache:	Englisch

Links:	Volltext [kostenfrei]

Themen:	610 Recruitment Status: Recruiting Respiratory Insufficiency Study Type: Interventional

Anmerkungen:	Source: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record., First posted: August 8, 2019, Last downloaded: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on January 24, 2024, Last updated: January 24, 2024

Study ID:	NCT04050007 APHP180559 2019-A00289-48
Veröffentlichungen zur Studie:

fisyears:
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):	CTG003131998