Judging the social value of controlled human infection studies

In controlled human infection (CHI) studies, investigators deliberately infect healthy individuals with pathogens in order to study mechanisms of disease or obtain preliminary efficacy data on investigational vaccines and medicines. CHI studies offer a fast and cost-effective way of generating new scientific insights, prioritizing investigational products for clinical testing, and reducing the risk that large numbers of people are exposed to ineffective or harmful substances in research or in practice. Yet depending on the pathogen, CHI studies can involve significant risks or burdens for participants, pose risks to individuals or communities not involved in the research, and lead to public controversy. It is therefore essential to ensure that the risks of CHI studies are justified by their social value—that is, their potential to generate benefits for society—and that public trust can be maintained. In this paper, we aim to clarify how research sponsors, research ethics committees and other reviewers should judge the social value of CHI studies. We develop a list of relevant considerations for making social value judgments based on the standard view of social value. We then use this list to discuss the example of potentially conducting dengue virus CHI studies in endemic settings. We argue that dengue virus CHI studies in endemic settings would fall on the higher end of the spectrum of social value, mostly because of their potential to redirect all fields of future dengue research. Drawing on this discussion, we derive several general recommendations for how reviewers should judge the social value of CHI studies..

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

[2020]

2020

Erschienen:

2020

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:34

Enthalten in:

Bioethics - 34(2020), 8, Seite 749-763

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Rid, Annette [VerfasserIn]
Roestenberg, Meta [VerfasserIn]

Links:

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Themen:

Acceptable risk
Controlled human infection studies
Dengue
Ethics
Human challenge trials
Human infection challenge studies
Scientific value
Social value
Voluntary infection studies

doi:

10.1111/bioe.12794

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

1735929344