Evaluating witness testimony : Juror knowledge, false memory, and the utility of evidence-based directions

© The Author(s) 2021..

Eyewitness evidence is often important in criminal cases, but false or misleading eyewitness evidence is known to be a leading cause of wrongful convictions. One explanation for mistakes that jurors are making when evaluating eyewitness evidence is their lack of accurate knowledge relating to false memory. This article examines lay beliefs relating to memory and ways in which they diverge from expert consensus. It identifies ways in which current directions provided to jurors in this area are likely to be deficient in influencing juror knowledge and in helping them apply that knowledge in a case context, and develops criteria that can be used to assess the likely effectiveness of directions. A new evidence-based training direction is designed based on these criteria, and tested in a mock jury study (N = 411). Results suggest that the proposed direction is more effective than a basic direction in influencing juror knowledge and facilitating the application of that knowledge to case facts.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2021

Erschienen:

2021

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:25

Enthalten in:

The international journal of evidence & proof - 25(2021), 4 vom: 15. Okt., Seite 264-285

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Helm, Rebecca K [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Criminal procedure
Eyewitness memory
False memory.
Journal Article
Legal directions
Psychology and law

Anmerkungen:

Date Revised 24.03.2022

published: Print-Electronic

Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE

doi:

10.1177/13657127211031018

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM331990539