Cost-Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Other Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in the Prevention of Thromboembolic Complications Among Finnish Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

© 2021 Hallinen et al..

PURPOSE: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased steadily in Finland. DOACs have been shown to be cost-effective in comparison to warfarin, but published evidence of relative cost-effectiveness between DOACs is still scarce and mostly based on indirect comparisons of clinical trial evidence. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of apixaban to dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin in a Finnish setting using real-life evidence where available.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A lifetime Markov simulation model used previously in a published Finnish assessment comparing apixaban and warfarin was modified and updated with the relative effectiveness and safety data available from the real-world NAXOS-study and representative Finnish input data for patient characteristics, event risks, mortality, resource use, costs, and quality of life. Apixaban's cost-effectiveness was assessed from health care payer perspective (using 3% per year discount rate) based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, cost per quality-adjusted life year [QALY] gained), probability of cost-effectiveness (at willingness-to-pay [WTP] of 35,000 euros/QALY), and net monetary benefit (NMB).

RESULTS: Apixaban increased the average modelled quality-adjusted life-expectancy and reduced the average total health care costs of AF patients when compared to warfarin (+0.14 QALYs, -3691 euros), dabigatran (+0.11 QALYs, -404 euros), and rivaroxaban (+0.03 QALYs, -43 euros). The resulting NMB of apixaban versus warfarin, dabigatran and rivaroxaban was 8723, 4168, and 1129 euros, respectively. The respective probabilities of apixaban being cost-effective against each comparator were 100%, 92.7%, and 64.0%.

CONCLUSION: In this modelling study, apixaban dominated other anticoagulants in the Finnish real-life setting.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2021

Erschienen:

2021

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:13

Enthalten in:

ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR - 13(2021) vom: 01., Seite 745-755

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Hallinen, Taru [VerfasserIn]
Soini, Erkki [VerfasserIn]
Asseburg, Christian [VerfasserIn]
Linna, Miika [VerfasserIn]
Eloranta, Pia [VerfasserIn]
Sintonen, Sari [VerfasserIn]
Kosunen, Mikko [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Apixaban
Cost-utility
Dabigatran
Economic evaluation
Journal Article
Rivaroxaban
Warfarin

Anmerkungen:

Date Revised 25.04.2022

published: Electronic-eCollection

Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE

doi:

10.2147/CEOR.S317078

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM32957096X