Comparison of the Automated Fluorescent Immunoassay System With Roche Elecsys and Beckman Coulter Access 2 Assays for Anti-Müllerian Hormone Measurement
BACKGROUND: Since 2017, automated assays have been used in most clinical laboratories for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level measurement. We evaluated the analytical performance of the newly developed automated fluorescent immunoassay system (AFIAS) AMH assay (Boditech Med, Gangwon-do, Korea) in comparison with the Roche Elecsys and Beckman Coulter Access 2 AMH assays.
METHODS: Analytical performance of the AFIAS AMH assay was assessed in terms of linearity, repeatability, and within-laboratory precision (CV%) using human recombinant AMH samples according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines EP05 and EP06. Using 293 serum samples collected from an infertility clinic, the AMH levels were compared across AFIAS, Elecsys, and Access 2 AMH assays according to the CLSI EP09 guidelines.
RESULTS: The AFIAS AMH assay results were linear across the measurement range of 0.420-72.386 pmol/L AMH, with repeatability of 6.341%. CV% of the AFIAS AMH assay for three levels of control, 1.786, 7.143, and 56.857 pmol/L, were 5.801%, 5.714%, and 6.228%, respectively. The results of the three AMH assays showed strong correlation: AFIAS and Elecsys [slope, 1.055 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.022-1.088) and Spearman's rho, 0.978 (95% CI, 0.973-0.983)], Elecsys and Access 2 [slope, 0.813 (95% CI, 0.791-0.834) and Spearman's rho, 0.986 (95% CI, 0.983-0.989)], and AFIAS and Access 2 [slope, 0.836 (95% CI, 0.821-0.853) and Spearman's rho, 0.984 (95% CI, 0.980-0.988)].
CONCLUSIONS: The AFIAS AMH assay may be an alternative to the Roche Elecsys and Beckman Coulter Access 2 AMH assays.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:42 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Annals of laboratory medicine - 42(2022), 1 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 47-53 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Han, Aera [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
80497-65-0 |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 17.09.2021 Date Revised 25.04.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3343/alm.2022.42.1.47 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM329184261 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM329184261 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226203422.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3343/alm.2022.42.1.47 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1097.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM329184261 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)34374348 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Han, Aera |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of the Automated Fluorescent Immunoassay System With Roche Elecsys and Beckman Coulter Access 2 Assays for Anti-Müllerian Hormone Measurement |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 17.09.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 25.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Since 2017, automated assays have been used in most clinical laboratories for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level measurement. We evaluated the analytical performance of the newly developed automated fluorescent immunoassay system (AFIAS) AMH assay (Boditech Med, Gangwon-do, Korea) in comparison with the Roche Elecsys and Beckman Coulter Access 2 AMH assays | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Analytical performance of the AFIAS AMH assay was assessed in terms of linearity, repeatability, and within-laboratory precision (CV%) using human recombinant AMH samples according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines EP05 and EP06. Using 293 serum samples collected from an infertility clinic, the AMH levels were compared across AFIAS, Elecsys, and Access 2 AMH assays according to the CLSI EP09 guidelines | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The AFIAS AMH assay results were linear across the measurement range of 0.420-72.386 pmol/L AMH, with repeatability of 6.341%. CV% of the AFIAS AMH assay for three levels of control, 1.786, 7.143, and 56.857 pmol/L, were 5.801%, 5.714%, and 6.228%, respectively. The results of the three AMH assays showed strong correlation: AFIAS and Elecsys [slope, 1.055 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.022-1.088) and Spearman's rho, 0.978 (95% CI, 0.973-0.983)], Elecsys and Access 2 [slope, 0.813 (95% CI, 0.791-0.834) and Spearman's rho, 0.986 (95% CI, 0.983-0.989)], and AFIAS and Access 2 [slope, 0.836 (95% CI, 0.821-0.853) and Spearman's rho, 0.984 (95% CI, 0.980-0.988)] | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: The AFIAS AMH assay may be an alternative to the Roche Elecsys and Beckman Coulter Access 2 AMH assays | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Anti-Müllerian hormone | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Automated fluorescent immunoassay system AMH assay | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparison | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Performance | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anti-Mullerian Hormone |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 80497-65-0 |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Suh, Borum |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yi, Gwang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lee, Yoo Jin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kim, Sung Eun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annals of laboratory medicine |d 2012 |g 42(2022), 1 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 47-53 |w (DE-627)NLM215937082 |x 2234-3814 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g day:01 |g month:01 |g pages:47-53 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2022.42.1.47 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 42 |j 2022 |e 1 |b 01 |c 01 |h 47-53 | ||