Comparison of Aerial Thermal Infrared Imagery and Helicopter Surveys of Bison (Bison bison) in Grand Canyon National Park, USA
Aerial thermal infrared (TIR) surveys are an attractive option for estimating abundances of large mammals inhabiting extensive and heterogeneous terrain. Compared to standard helicopter or fixed-wing aerial surveys, TIR flights can be conducted at higher altitudes translating into greater spatial coverage and increased observer safety; however, monetary costs are much greater. Further, there is no consensus on whether TIR surveys offer improved detection. Consequently, we performed a study to compare results of a TIR and helicopter survey of bison (Bison bison) on the Powell Plateau in Grand Canyon National Park, USA. We also compared results of both surveys to estimates obtained using a larger dataset of bison helicopter detections along the entire North Rim of the Grand Canyon. Observers in the TIR survey counted fewer individual bison than helicopter observers (101 to 127) and the TIR survey cost was 367% higher. Additionally, the TIR estimate was 18.8% lower than the estimate obtained using a larger dataset, while the comparative helicopter survey was 9.3% lower. Despite our small sample size, we found that helicopter surveys are currently the best method for estimating bison abundances in dense canopy cover sites due to ostensibly more accurate estimates and lower cost compared to TIR surveys. Additional research will be needed to evaluate the efficacy of these methods, as well as very high resolution satellite imagery, for bison populations in more open landscapes.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:21 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) - 21(2021), 15 vom: 27. Juli |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Hennig, Jacob D [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Abundance estimation |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 11.08.2021 Date Revised 13.08.2021 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3390/s21155087 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM329164333 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM329164333 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225204522.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/s21155087 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1097.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM329164333 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)34372324 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)5087 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hennig, Jacob D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of Aerial Thermal Infrared Imagery and Helicopter Surveys of Bison (Bison bison) in Grand Canyon National Park, USA |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 11.08.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 13.08.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Aerial thermal infrared (TIR) surveys are an attractive option for estimating abundances of large mammals inhabiting extensive and heterogeneous terrain. Compared to standard helicopter or fixed-wing aerial surveys, TIR flights can be conducted at higher altitudes translating into greater spatial coverage and increased observer safety; however, monetary costs are much greater. Further, there is no consensus on whether TIR surveys offer improved detection. Consequently, we performed a study to compare results of a TIR and helicopter survey of bison (Bison bison) on the Powell Plateau in Grand Canyon National Park, USA. We also compared results of both surveys to estimates obtained using a larger dataset of bison helicopter detections along the entire North Rim of the Grand Canyon. Observers in the TIR survey counted fewer individual bison than helicopter observers (101 to 127) and the TIR survey cost was 367% higher. Additionally, the TIR estimate was 18.8% lower than the estimate obtained using a larger dataset, while the comparative helicopter survey was 9.3% lower. Despite our small sample size, we found that helicopter surveys are currently the best method for estimating bison abundances in dense canopy cover sites due to ostensibly more accurate estimates and lower cost compared to TIR surveys. Additional research will be needed to evaluate the efficacy of these methods, as well as very high resolution satellite imagery, for bison populations in more open landscapes | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a abundance estimation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a aerial survey | |
| 650 | 4 | |a double-observer | |
| 650 | 4 | |a residual heterogeneity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a sightability | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schoenecker, Kathryn A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Terwilliger, Miranda L N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Holm, Gregory W |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Laake, Jeffrey L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) |d 2007 |g 21(2021), 15 vom: 27. Juli |w (DE-627)NLM187985170 |x 1424-8220 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2021 |g number:15 |g day:27 |g month:07 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155087 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 21 |j 2021 |e 15 |b 27 |c 07 | ||