Reliability and validity of smartphone applications to measure the spinal range of motion : A systematic review
Introduction: The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review on the reliability and validity of various smartphone applications for spinal range of motion (ROM) measurements.Methods: Eleven studies were selected following an electronic search of PubMed, CINAHAL, Medline, Embase and SPORTDiscus. Quality appraisals of selected studies were conducted using a standardized appraisal tool.Results: Most studies demonstrated a good intra- and inter-rater reliability, as well as validity in more than 50% of joint movements. At the same time, relative reliability/validity outcomes (e.g. interclass correlation co-efficient) were stronger than absolute reliability/validity outcomes (e.g. mean differences, limits of agreement). Spinal rotation movement showed less reliability and validity when compared to other spinal movements.ConclusionsːResult of the study supports the use of smartphone applications for ROM measurements of spinal joints. However, we cannot advocate the most appropriate application for spinal ROM measurement or suggest which application is superior to all others. As clinicians have multiple options in selecting applications, it is recommended they use applications that have proven reliable and valid for that particular joint. Data from this study provides clinicians with evidence-based research on smartphone devices for measuring spinal joint ROM in clinical settings.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:18 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Expert review of medical devices - 18(2021), 9 vom: 02. Sept., Seite 893-901 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Nuhmani, Shibili [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Joint range of motion |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 25.11.2021 Date Revised 25.11.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1080/17434440.2021.1962290 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM328786314 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM328786314 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225203703.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/17434440.2021.1962290 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1095.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM328786314 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)34334079 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Nuhmani, Shibili |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Reliability and validity of smartphone applications to measure the spinal range of motion |b A systematic review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 25.11.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 25.11.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Introduction: The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review on the reliability and validity of various smartphone applications for spinal range of motion (ROM) measurements.Methods: Eleven studies were selected following an electronic search of PubMed, CINAHAL, Medline, Embase and SPORTDiscus. Quality appraisals of selected studies were conducted using a standardized appraisal tool.Results: Most studies demonstrated a good intra- and inter-rater reliability, as well as validity in more than 50% of joint movements. At the same time, relative reliability/validity outcomes (e.g. interclass correlation co-efficient) were stronger than absolute reliability/validity outcomes (e.g. mean differences, limits of agreement). Spinal rotation movement showed less reliability and validity when compared to other spinal movements.ConclusionsːResult of the study supports the use of smartphone applications for ROM measurements of spinal joints. However, we cannot advocate the most appropriate application for spinal ROM measurement or suggest which application is superior to all others. As clinicians have multiple options in selecting applications, it is recommended they use applications that have proven reliable and valid for that particular joint. Data from this study provides clinicians with evidence-based research on smartphone devices for measuring spinal joint ROM in clinical settings | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Joint range of motion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a reliability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a smartphones | |
| 650 | 4 | |a software application | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khan, Moazzam Hussain |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kachanathu, Shaji J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bari, Mohd Arshad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Abualait, Turki S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Muaidi, Qassim I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Expert review of medical devices |d 2004 |g 18(2021), 9 vom: 02. Sept., Seite 893-901 |w (DE-627)NLM158941349 |x 1745-2422 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2021 |g number:9 |g day:02 |g month:09 |g pages:893-901 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2021.1962290 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 18 |j 2021 |e 9 |b 02 |c 09 |h 893-901 | ||