Transfer of mode switching performance : from training to upper-limb prosthesis use

BACKGROUND: Current myoelectric prostheses are multi-articulated and offer multiple modes. Switching between modes is often done through pre-defined myosignals, so-called triggers, of which the training hardly is studied. We evaluated if switching skills trained without using a prosthesis transfer to actual prosthesis use and whether the available feedback during training influences this transfer. Furthermore we examined which clinically relevant performance measures and which myosignal features were adapted during training.

METHODS: Two experimental groups and one control group participated in a five day pre-test-post-test design study. Both experimental groups used their myosignals to perform a task. One group performed a serious game without seeing their myosignals, the second group was presented their myosignal on a screen. The control group played the serious game using the touchpad of the laptop. Each training session lasted 15 min. The pre- and post-test were identical for all groups and consisted of performing a task with an actual prosthesis, where switches had to be produced to change grip mode to relocate clothespins. Both clinically relevant performance measures and myosignal features were analysed.

RESULTS: 10 participants trained using the serious game, 10 participants trained with the visual myosignal and 8 the control task. All participants were unimpaired. Both experimental groups showed significant transfer of skill from training to prosthesis use, the control group did not. The degree of transfer did not differ between the two training groups. Clinically relevant measure 'accuracy' and feature of the myosignals 'variation in phasing' changed during training.

CONCLUSIONS: Training switching skills appeared to be successful. The skills trained in the game transferred to performance in a functional task. Learning switching skills is independent of the type of feedback used during training. Outcome measures hardly changed during training and further research is needed to explain this. It should be noted that five training sessions did not result in a level of performance needed for actual prosthesis use. Trial registration The study was approved by the local ethics committee (ECB 2014.02.28_1) and was included in the Dutch trial registry (NTR5876).

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2021

Erschienen:

2021

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:18

Enthalten in:

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation - 18(2021), 1 vom: 22. Mai, Seite 85

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Heerschop, Anniek [VerfasserIn]
van der Sluis, Corry K [VerfasserIn]
Bongers, Raoul M [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Assistive technology
Electromyography
Journal Article
Motor learning
Myoelectric control
Perception–action
Prosthesis
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Switching
Transfer

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 19.07.2021

Date Revised 02.04.2024

published: Electronic

NTR: NTR5876

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1186/s12984-021-00878-4

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM325722722