Histopathologic Diagnosis Discrepancies Between Preoperative Endoscopic Forceps Biopsies and Specimens Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Superficial Gastric Neoplasms
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: The standard of practice when a superficial lesion was identified during upper GI endoscopy is to take an endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) of the lesion. The histopathologic findings then will determine the management plan. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en-bloc resection for early neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract and provides an adequate specimen that permits a more reliable histopathologic assessment. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of histopathologic discrepancy between EFB and specimens resected by ESD, and to identify the predisposing risk factors for this discordance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study, enrolling patients with superficial gastric neoplasms that underwent EFB followed by ESD. We divided cases to concordant or discordant group according to the histopathologic diagnosis of EFB and ESD specimens. We also analyzed the features that may have influenced the occurrence of histopathologic discordance and the association between discordant samples of adenocarcinoma and neoplastic invasion to deeper layers.
RESULTS: A total of 115 gastric ESD procedures were performed with 84 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Histopathologic discordance between EFB and ESD specimens were observed in 35.8% of cases (30/84 lesions). The univariant-bivariant analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that histologic discordance was closely related to the size of the lesions ( P =0.028).
CONCLUSION: Histopathologic discrepancy between EFB and ESD specimens may occur in approximately one-third of cases, particularly for lesions over 20 mm, which may lead to crucial delays in gastric cancer precise diagnosis and treatment.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:57 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of clinical gastroenterology - 57(2023), 1 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 74-81 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Aliaga Ramos, Josué [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 16.12.2022 Date Revised 09.02.2023 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1097/MCG.0000000000001541 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM324378394 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM324378394 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225190210.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001541 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1081.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM324378394 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)33883515 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Aliaga Ramos, Josué |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Histopathologic Diagnosis Discrepancies Between Preoperative Endoscopic Forceps Biopsies and Specimens Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Superficial Gastric Neoplasms |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 16.12.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 09.02.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: The standard of practice when a superficial lesion was identified during upper GI endoscopy is to take an endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) of the lesion. The histopathologic findings then will determine the management plan. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en-bloc resection for early neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract and provides an adequate specimen that permits a more reliable histopathologic assessment. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of histopathologic discrepancy between EFB and specimens resected by ESD, and to identify the predisposing risk factors for this discordance | ||
520 | |a MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study, enrolling patients with superficial gastric neoplasms that underwent EFB followed by ESD. We divided cases to concordant or discordant group according to the histopathologic diagnosis of EFB and ESD specimens. We also analyzed the features that may have influenced the occurrence of histopathologic discordance and the association between discordant samples of adenocarcinoma and neoplastic invasion to deeper layers | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 115 gastric ESD procedures were performed with 84 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Histopathologic discordance between EFB and ESD specimens were observed in 35.8% of cases (30/84 lesions). The univariant-bivariant analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that histologic discordance was closely related to the size of the lesions ( P =0.028) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Histopathologic discrepancy between EFB and ESD specimens may occur in approximately one-third of cases, particularly for lesions over 20 mm, which may lead to crucial delays in gastric cancer precise diagnosis and treatment | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Pedrosa, Moises S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yoshida, Naohisa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Abdul Rani, Rafiz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Arantes, Vitor N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of clinical gastroenterology |d 1980 |g 57(2023), 1 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 74-81 |w (DE-627)NLM000468495 |x 1539-2031 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:57 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:01 |g month:01 |g pages:74-81 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001541 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 57 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 01 |c 01 |h 74-81 |