Comparison of internal target volumes defined by three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone-beam computed tomography images of a motion phantom
2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: To explore the variations of the gross tumor volume (GTV) from different three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) scan modes and the consistency of internal target volume (ITV) between different 3DCT, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scan, a study using a motion phantom simulating sinusoidal movement was conducted.
METHODS: For three 3DCT scan modes: the GTV was contoured, and ITVI was generated on the basis of GTV with a 10-mm margin while ITVII and ITVIII with a 0-mm margin on the motion direction. ITVCBCT and ITVMIP were contoured on the images of CBCT and maximum-intensity projection (MIP) reconstructed 4DCT images. The centroid position shifts of ITVs were analyzed. The volume consistency between ITVI, ITVII, ITVIII and ITVMIP were evaluated by calculating the Dice similarity coefficient (Dsc) and the value of Δ Volume (ΔV). Furthermore, the 3DCT and CBCT images from 12 NSCLC patients were retrospectively collected, then the Dsc and ΔV were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation of centroid position of ITVI, ITVII and ITVIII were 2.3±4.7, 2.6±4.0, and 1.0±1.4 mm, respectively. The mean ± standard deviation of Dsc between ITVI, ITVII, ITVIII and ITVMIP were 0.78±0.77, 0.86±0.1, and 0.94±0.05, respectively. The ΔV of ITVI, ITVII, ITVIII were 29.67%, 17.22%, and 6.46%, respectively. The ITV from CBCT showed a deduction rate of 3.1-9.3% compared to 4DCT. For the patients, the mean Dsc andΔV between ITVI and ITVCBCT were 0.50 and 60.76%.
CONCLUSIONS: The GTV acquired from 3DCT scan mode I possessed great deviation of centroid position and target volume. ITV on the basis of this GTV was significantly larger than ITVMIP. A good similarity was showed between ITVIII and ITVMIP, 4DCT is still a golden standard for the ITV delineation, but in the absence of 4DCT, image from 3DCT scan mode III and KV-CBCT may be considered for ITV delineation with caution.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:8 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Annals of translational medicine - 8(2020), 22 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 1488 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Wang, Yu [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Computed tomography |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 18.04.2022 published: Print Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.21037/atm-20-6246 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM318785056 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM318785056 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225170100.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.21037/atm-20-6246 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1062.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM318785056 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33313233 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wang, Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of internal target volumes defined by three-dimensional, four-dimensional, and cone-beam computed tomography images of a motion phantom |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 18.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: To explore the variations of the gross tumor volume (GTV) from different three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) scan modes and the consistency of internal target volume (ITV) between different 3DCT, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scan, a study using a motion phantom simulating sinusoidal movement was conducted | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: For three 3DCT scan modes: the GTV was contoured, and ITVI was generated on the basis of GTV with a 10-mm margin while ITVII and ITVIII with a 0-mm margin on the motion direction. ITVCBCT and ITVMIP were contoured on the images of CBCT and maximum-intensity projection (MIP) reconstructed 4DCT images. The centroid position shifts of ITVs were analyzed. The volume consistency between ITVI, ITVII, ITVIII and ITVMIP were evaluated by calculating the Dice similarity coefficient (Dsc) and the value of Δ Volume (ΔV). Furthermore, the 3DCT and CBCT images from 12 NSCLC patients were retrospectively collected, then the Dsc and ΔV were calculated | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation of centroid position of ITVI, ITVII and ITVIII were 2.3±4.7, 2.6±4.0, and 1.0±1.4 mm, respectively. The mean ± standard deviation of Dsc between ITVI, ITVII, ITVIII and ITVMIP were 0.78±0.77, 0.86±0.1, and 0.94±0.05, respectively. The ΔV of ITVI, ITVII, ITVIII were 29.67%, 17.22%, and 6.46%, respectively. The ITV from CBCT showed a deduction rate of 3.1-9.3% compared to 4DCT. For the patients, the mean Dsc andΔV between ITVI and ITVCBCT were 0.50 and 60.76% | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: The GTV acquired from 3DCT scan mode I possessed great deviation of centroid position and target volume. ITV on the basis of this GTV was significantly larger than ITVMIP. A good similarity was showed between ITVIII and ITVMIP, 4DCT is still a golden standard for the ITV delineation, but in the absence of 4DCT, image from 3DCT scan mode III and KV-CBCT may be considered for ITV delineation with caution | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a computed tomography | |
| 650 | 4 | |a gross tumor volume (GTV) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a internal gross tumor volume | |
| 650 | 4 | |a motion phantom | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, Tao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, Huiqin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bai, Penggang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhan, Qiong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liang, Xiaohua |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annals of translational medicine |d 2013 |g 8(2020), 22 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 1488 |w (DE-627)NLM23455374X |x 2305-5839 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2020 |g number:22 |g day:14 |g month:11 |g pages:1488 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6246 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 8 |j 2020 |e 22 |b 14 |c 11 |h 1488 | ||