A realist evaluation of a safe medication administration education programme
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: Continuing professional education (CPE) for nurses is deemed an essential component to develop, maintain and update professional skills. However, there is little empirical evidence of its effectiveness or factors which may influence its application into practice.
OBJECTIVE: This paper explores a continuing professional education programme on the safe administration of medication and how new knowledge and skills are transferred into clinical practice.
DESIGN: Realist evaluation provided the framework for this study. Realist evaluation stresses the need to evaluate programmes within "context," and to ask what "mechanisms" are acting to produce which "outcomes." This realist evaluation had four distinct stages. Firstly, theories were built as conjectured CMO configurations (Stage 1 and 2), then these cCMO were tested (Stage 3) and they were then refined (Stage 4).
METHODS: Data was collected through document analysis and interviews (9) to build and refine CMOs. The conjectured CMOs were tested by clinical observation, interview (7), analysis of further documents and analysis of data from reported critical incidents and nursing care metric measurements.
RESULTS: This study has shown the significant role of the ward manager in the application of new learning from the education programme to practice. Local leadership was found to enable a patient safety culture and the adoption of a quality improvement approach. The multi-disciplinary team at both organisation and local level was also found to be a significant context for the application of the education programme into practice. Reasoning skills and receptivity to change were identified to be key mechanisms which were enabled within the described contexts.
CONCLUSION: The findings from this study should inform policy and practice on the factors required to ensure learning from CPE is applied in practice. The realist evaluation framework should be applied when evaluating CPE programmes as the rationale for such programmes is to maintain and improve patient care.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:97 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Nurse education today - 97(2021) vom: 15. Feb., Seite 104685 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Browne, Freda [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Continuing professional development (CPD) |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 21.06.2021 Date Revised 21.06.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104685 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM318759969 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM318759969 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225170029.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104685 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1062.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM318759969 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33310699 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0260-6917(20)31535-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Browne, Freda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A realist evaluation of a safe medication administration education programme |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 21.06.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 21.06.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Continuing professional education (CPE) for nurses is deemed an essential component to develop, maintain and update professional skills. However, there is little empirical evidence of its effectiveness or factors which may influence its application into practice | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: This paper explores a continuing professional education programme on the safe administration of medication and how new knowledge and skills are transferred into clinical practice | ||
| 520 | |a DESIGN: Realist evaluation provided the framework for this study. Realist evaluation stresses the need to evaluate programmes within "context," and to ask what "mechanisms" are acting to produce which "outcomes." This realist evaluation had four distinct stages. Firstly, theories were built as conjectured CMO configurations (Stage 1 and 2), then these cCMO were tested (Stage 3) and they were then refined (Stage 4) | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Data was collected through document analysis and interviews (9) to build and refine CMOs. The conjectured CMOs were tested by clinical observation, interview (7), analysis of further documents and analysis of data from reported critical incidents and nursing care metric measurements | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: This study has shown the significant role of the ward manager in the application of new learning from the education programme to practice. Local leadership was found to enable a patient safety culture and the adoption of a quality improvement approach. The multi-disciplinary team at both organisation and local level was also found to be a significant context for the application of the education programme into practice. Reasoning skills and receptivity to change were identified to be key mechanisms which were enabled within the described contexts | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The findings from this study should inform policy and practice on the factors required to ensure learning from CPE is applied in practice. The realist evaluation framework should be applied when evaluating CPE programmes as the rationale for such programmes is to maintain and improve patient care | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Continuing professional development (CPD) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Continuing professional education (CPE) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medication safety | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Programme evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Realist evaluation | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hannigan, Ben |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Harden, Jane |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Nurse education today |d 1993 |g 97(2021) vom: 15. Feb., Seite 104685 |w (DE-627)NLM012681571 |x 1532-2793 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:97 |g year:2021 |g day:15 |g month:02 |g pages:104685 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104685 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 97 |j 2021 |b 15 |c 02 |h 104685 | ||