Is Machine Learning a Better Way to Identify COVID-19 Patients Who Might Benefit from Hydroxychloroquine Treatment?-The IDENTIFY Trial
Therapeutic agents for the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been proposed, but evidence supporting their use is limited. A machine learning algorithm was developed in order to identify a subpopulation of COVID-19 patients for whom hydroxychloroquine was associated with improved survival; this population might be relevant for study in a clinical trial. A pragmatic trial was conducted at six United States hospitals. We enrolled COVID-19 patients that were admitted between 10 March and 4 June 2020. Treatment was not randomized. The study endpoint was mortality; discharge was a competing event. Hazard ratios were obtained on the entire population, and on the subpopulation indicated by the algorithm as suitable for treatment. A total of 290 patients were enrolled. In the subpopulation that was identified by the algorithm, hydroxychloroquine was associated with a statistically significant (p = 0.011) increase in survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-0.75). Adjusted survival among the algorithm indicated patients was 82.6% in the treated arm and 51.2% in the arm not treated. No association between treatment and mortality was observed in the general population. A 31% increase in survival at the end of the study was observed in a population of COVID-19 patients that were identified by a machine learning algorithm as having a better outcome with hydroxychloroquine treatment. Precision medicine approaches may be useful in identifying a subpopulation of COVID-19 patients more likely to be proven to benefit from hydroxychloroquine treatment in a clinical trial.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:9 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of clinical medicine - 9(2020), 12 vom: 26. Nov. |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Burdick, Hoyt [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
COVID-19 |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 26.12.2020 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.3390/jcm9123834 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM318225042 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM318225042 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225164915.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/jcm9123834 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1060.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM318225042 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)33256141 | ||
035 | |a (PII)E3834 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Burdick, Hoyt |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is Machine Learning a Better Way to Identify COVID-19 Patients Who Might Benefit from Hydroxychloroquine Treatment?-The IDENTIFY Trial |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 26.12.2020 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Therapeutic agents for the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been proposed, but evidence supporting their use is limited. A machine learning algorithm was developed in order to identify a subpopulation of COVID-19 patients for whom hydroxychloroquine was associated with improved survival; this population might be relevant for study in a clinical trial. A pragmatic trial was conducted at six United States hospitals. We enrolled COVID-19 patients that were admitted between 10 March and 4 June 2020. Treatment was not randomized. The study endpoint was mortality; discharge was a competing event. Hazard ratios were obtained on the entire population, and on the subpopulation indicated by the algorithm as suitable for treatment. A total of 290 patients were enrolled. In the subpopulation that was identified by the algorithm, hydroxychloroquine was associated with a statistically significant (p = 0.011) increase in survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-0.75). Adjusted survival among the algorithm indicated patients was 82.6% in the treated arm and 51.2% in the arm not treated. No association between treatment and mortality was observed in the general population. A 31% increase in survival at the end of the study was observed in a population of COVID-19 patients that were identified by a machine learning algorithm as having a better outcome with hydroxychloroquine treatment. Precision medicine approaches may be useful in identifying a subpopulation of COVID-19 patients more likely to be proven to benefit from hydroxychloroquine treatment in a clinical trial | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a SARS-Cov-2 | |
650 | 4 | |a drug treatment | |
650 | 4 | |a hydroxychloroquine | |
650 | 4 | |a machine learning | |
650 | 4 | |a mortality | |
650 | 4 | |a prediction | |
700 | 1 | |a Lam, Carson |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mataraso, Samson |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Siefkas, Anna |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Braden, Gregory |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dellinger, R Phillip |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a McCoy, Andrea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Vincent, Jean-Louis |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Green-Saxena, Abigail |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Barnes, Gina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hoffman, Jana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Calvert, Jacob |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pellegrini, Emily |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Das, Ritankar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of clinical medicine |d 2012 |g 9(2020), 12 vom: 26. Nov. |w (DE-627)NLM230666310 |x 2077-0383 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2020 |g number:12 |g day:26 |g month:11 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123834 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 9 |j 2020 |e 12 |b 26 |c 11 |