Language disparity is not a significant barrier for time-sensitive care of acute ischemic stroke
BACKGROUND: Language barriers were reported to affect timely access to health care and outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of language disparity on quality benchmarks of acute ischemic stroke therapy.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke at the University of California Irvine Medical Center from 2013 to 2016 were studied. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to their preferred language: English, Spanish, and other languages. Quality benchmarks and outcomes of the 3 language groups were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the 928 admissions, 69.7% patients recorded English as preferred language, as compared to 17.3% Spanish and 13.0% other languages. There was no significant difference in the rate of receiving intravenous thrombolysis (24.3, 22.1 and 21.0%), last-known-well to door time, door-to-imaging time, door-to-needle time, and hospital length of stay among the 3 language groups. In univariate analysis, the other languages group had lower chance of favorable outcomes than the English-speaking group (26.3% vs 40.4, p < 0.05) while the Spanish-speaking group had lower mortality rate than English-speaking group (3.1% vs 7.7%, p = 0.05). After adjusting for age and initial NIHSS scores, multivariate regression models showed no significant difference in favorable outcomes and mortality between different language groups.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate no significant difference in quality benchmarks and outcome of acute ischemic stroke among 3 different language groups. Our results suggest that limited English proficiency is not a significant barrier for time-sensitive stroke care at Comprehensive Stroke Center.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:20 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC neurology - 20(2020), 1 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 363 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Anderson, Noriko [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Acute ischemic stroke |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 15.12.2020 Date Revised 15.12.2020 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12883-020-01940-9 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM315786949 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM315786949 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225155653.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12883-020-01940-9 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1052.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM315786949 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33008325 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Anderson, Noriko |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Language disparity is not a significant barrier for time-sensitive care of acute ischemic stroke |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 15.12.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 15.12.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Language barriers were reported to affect timely access to health care and outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of language disparity on quality benchmarks of acute ischemic stroke therapy | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke at the University of California Irvine Medical Center from 2013 to 2016 were studied. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to their preferred language: English, Spanish, and other languages. Quality benchmarks and outcomes of the 3 language groups were analyzed | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Of the 928 admissions, 69.7% patients recorded English as preferred language, as compared to 17.3% Spanish and 13.0% other languages. There was no significant difference in the rate of receiving intravenous thrombolysis (24.3, 22.1 and 21.0%), last-known-well to door time, door-to-imaging time, door-to-needle time, and hospital length of stay among the 3 language groups. In univariate analysis, the other languages group had lower chance of favorable outcomes than the English-speaking group (26.3% vs 40.4, p < 0.05) while the Spanish-speaking group had lower mortality rate than English-speaking group (3.1% vs 7.7%, p = 0.05). After adjusting for age and initial NIHSS scores, multivariate regression models showed no significant difference in favorable outcomes and mortality between different language groups | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: We demonstrate no significant difference in quality benchmarks and outcome of acute ischemic stroke among 3 different language groups. Our results suggest that limited English proficiency is not a significant barrier for time-sensitive stroke care at Comprehensive Stroke Center | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Acute ischemic stroke | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Benchmark | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Language disparity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Outcome | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Thrombolysis | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Janarious, Afra |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, Shimeng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Flanagan, Lisa A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stradling, Dana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yu, Wengui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC neurology |d 2001 |g 20(2020), 1 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 363 |w (DE-627)NLM11120092X |x 1471-2377 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g day:02 |g month:10 |g pages:363 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01940-9 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 20 |j 2020 |e 1 |b 02 |c 10 |h 363 | ||