A Closer Look at the "Right" Format for Clinical Decision Support : Methods for Evaluating a Storyboard BestPractice Advisory

(1) Background: The five rights of clinical decision support (CDS) are a well-known framework for planning the nuances of CDS, but recent advancements have given us more options to modify the format of the alert. One-size-fits-all assessments fail to capture the nuance of different BestPractice Advisory (BPA) formats. To demonstrate a tailored evaluation methodology, we assessed a BPA after implementation of Storyboard for changes in alert fatigue, behavior influence, and task completion; (2) Methods: Data from 19 weeks before and after implementation were used to evaluate differences in each domain. Individual clinics were evaluated for task completion and compared for changes pre- and post-redesign; (3) Results: The change in format was correlated with an increase in alert fatigue, a decrease in erroneous free text answers, and worsened task completion at a system level. At a local level, however, 14% of clinics had improved task completion; (4) Conclusions: While the change in BPA format was correlated with decreased performance, the changes may have been driven primarily by the COVID-19 pandemic. The framework and metrics proposed can be used in future studies to assess the impact of new CDS formats. Although the changes in this study seemed undesirable in aggregate, some positive changes were observed at the level of individual clinics. Personalized implementations of CDS tools based on local need should be considered.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2020

Erschienen:

2020

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:10

Enthalten in:

Journal of personalized medicine - 10(2020), 4 vom: 23. Sept.

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Douthit, Brian J [VerfasserIn]
Musser, R Clayton [VerfasserIn]
Lytle, Kay S [VerfasserIn]
Richesson, Rachel L [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Alert fatigue
Clinical decision support
Journal Article
Systems evaluation

Anmerkungen:

Date Revised 07.12.2020

published: Electronic

Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE

doi:

10.3390/jpm10040142

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM315483180