Use of a two-sided tolerance interval in the design and evaluation of biosimilarity in clinical studies
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
In assessing biosimilarity between two products, the question to ask is always "How similar is similar?" Traditionally, the equivalence of the means between products is the primary consideration in a clinical trial. This study suggests an alternative assessment for testing a certain percentage of the population of differences lying within a prespecified interval. In doing so, the accuracy and precision are assessed simultaneously by judging whether a two-sided tolerance interval falls within a prespecified acceptance range. We further derive an asymptotic distribution of the tolerance limits to determine the sample size for achieving a targeted level of power. Our numerical study shows that the proposed two-sided tolerance interval test controls the type I error rate and provides sufficient power. A real example is presented to illustrate our proposed approach.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:20 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Pharmaceutical statistics - 20(2021), 1 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 175-184 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Chiang, Chieh [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Biosimilarity |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 25.11.2021 Date Revised 31.05.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1002/pst.2065 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM314429719 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM314429719 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225152721.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/pst.2065 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1048.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM314429719 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32869921 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Chiang, Chieh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Use of a two-sided tolerance interval in the design and evaluation of biosimilarity in clinical studies |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 25.11.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 31.05.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | ||
520 | |a In assessing biosimilarity between two products, the question to ask is always "How similar is similar?" Traditionally, the equivalence of the means between products is the primary consideration in a clinical trial. This study suggests an alternative assessment for testing a certain percentage of the population of differences lying within a prespecified interval. In doing so, the accuracy and precision are assessed simultaneously by judging whether a two-sided tolerance interval falls within a prespecified acceptance range. We further derive an asymptotic distribution of the tolerance limits to determine the sample size for achieving a targeted level of power. Our numerical study shows that the proposed two-sided tolerance interval test controls the type I error rate and provides sufficient power. A real example is presented to illustrate our proposed approach | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a biosimilarity | |
650 | 4 | |a sample size determination | |
650 | 4 | |a two-sided tolerance interval | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Chi-Tian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hsiao, Chin-Fu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Pharmaceutical statistics |d 2006 |g 20(2021), 1 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 175-184 |w (DE-627)NLM166361305 |x 1539-1612 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:07 |g month:01 |g pages:175-184 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pst.2065 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 20 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 07 |c 01 |h 175-184 |