Flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy with regional anesthesia vs general anesthesia : A prospective randomized study
Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology..
PURPOSE: To compare the effect of general anesthesia (GA) and regional anesthesia (RA) on f-URS outcomes and surgeon comfort.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted between June 2017 to January 2018 and data collection was applied in a prospective, randomized fashion. 120 patients participated in the study and were divided into RA group (n=56) and GA group (n=64). Demographic, operative and post-operative parameters of patients were analysed. The end point of this study was the effect of two anesthesia regimens on the comfort of the surgeon, and the comparability of feasibility and safety against perioperative complications.
RESULTS: The study including 120 randomized patients, 14 patients were excluded from the study and completed with 106 patients (45 in RA group and 61 in GA group). No difference was detected between the two groups in terms of preoperative data. During the monitorization of operative vital signs, 3 patients in RA group experienced bradycardia, and this finding was significant when compared with GA group (p=0.041). Additionally, 2 patients in RA group experienced mucosal tears and 1 patient experienced hemorrhage during the operation, but no complications were observed in the GA group (p=0.041). Postoperative surgeon comfort evaluation revealed statistically significant results in favor of GA group (p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Both GA and RA are equally effective and safe anesthesia methods for f-URS procedures. However, RA group showed significantly increased likelihood of bradycardia and mucosal injury during surgery, and significantly decreased surgeon comfort during surgery.
| Errataetall: |
CommentIn: Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Nov-Dec;46(6):1019-1020. - PMID 32822131 |
|---|---|
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:46 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology - 46(2020), 6 vom: 16. Nov., Seite 1010-1018 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Sahan, Murat [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Anesthesia, General |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 27.01.2021 Date Revised 27.01.2021 published: Print CommentIn: Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Nov-Dec;46(6):1019-1020. - PMID 32822131 Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0770 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM313958572 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM313958572 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225151709.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0770 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1046.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM313958572 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32822130 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sahan, Murat |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy with regional anesthesia vs general anesthesia |b A prospective randomized study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 27.01.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 27.01.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a CommentIn: Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Nov-Dec;46(6):1019-1020. - PMID 32822131 | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology. | ||
| 520 | |a PURPOSE: To compare the effect of general anesthesia (GA) and regional anesthesia (RA) on f-URS outcomes and surgeon comfort | ||
| 520 | |a MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted between June 2017 to January 2018 and data collection was applied in a prospective, randomized fashion. 120 patients participated in the study and were divided into RA group (n=56) and GA group (n=64). Demographic, operative and post-operative parameters of patients were analysed. The end point of this study was the effect of two anesthesia regimens on the comfort of the surgeon, and the comparability of feasibility and safety against perioperative complications | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The study including 120 randomized patients, 14 patients were excluded from the study and completed with 106 patients (45 in RA group and 61 in GA group). No difference was detected between the two groups in terms of preoperative data. During the monitorization of operative vital signs, 3 patients in RA group experienced bradycardia, and this finding was significant when compared with GA group (p=0.041). Additionally, 2 patients in RA group experienced mucosal tears and 1 patient experienced hemorrhage during the operation, but no complications were observed in the GA group (p=0.041). Postoperative surgeon comfort evaluation revealed statistically significant results in favor of GA group (p=0.001) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Both GA and RA are equally effective and safe anesthesia methods for f-URS procedures. However, RA group showed significantly increased likelihood of bradycardia and mucosal injury during surgery, and significantly decreased surgeon comfort during surgery | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Anesthesia, General | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Lithotripsy, Laser | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Urolithiasis | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sarilar, Omer |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Akbulut, Mehmet Fatih |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Demir, Eren |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Savun, Metin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sen, Oznur |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ozgor, Faruk |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology |d 2002 |g 46(2020), 6 vom: 16. Nov., Seite 1010-1018 |w (DE-627)NLM152735291 |x 1677-6119 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:46 |g year:2020 |g number:6 |g day:16 |g month:11 |g pages:1010-1018 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0770 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 46 |j 2020 |e 6 |b 16 |c 11 |h 1010-1018 | ||