Performance of normal-hearing listeners on the Repeat-Recall test in different noise configurations
OBJECTIVE: This study measured the performance of normal-hearing listeners on the Repeat-Recall Test (RRT) in two noise types (2-talker babble [2TBN] and continuous speech-shaped noise [SSN]) by two noise azimuths (0° and 180°) configurations at signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of 0, 5, 10, and 15 dB and quiet.
DESIGN: Within-subject repeated measures.
STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty-one listeners with normal hearing who also passed cognitive screening were tested in the sound-field with the speech stimulus presented from 0° at 75 dB SPL in 4 noise configurations. The order of SNRs, noise configurations, and RRT topic conditions was counterbalanced across listeners.
RESULTS: Analysis revealed that repeat scores were significantly better for 2TBN, for noise at 180°, and for high context (HC) sentences. Recall performance was significantly better for SSN and HC sentences. Listening effort ratings were higher for SSN and for noise front condition at SNR ≤ 10 dB. The 2TBN noise was tolerated longer than SSN. Performance on all measures improved with SNRs.
CONCLUSIONS: These data showed performance differences among noise configurations and provided a preliminary basis for comparison with hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the RRT.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:60 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
International journal of audiology - 60(2021), 1 vom: 21. Jan., Seite 35-43 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Kuk, Francis [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Journal Article |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 15.10.2021 Date Revised 15.10.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1080/14992027.2020.1807626 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM313944261 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM313944261 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225151651.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/14992027.2020.1807626 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1046.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM313944261 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32820697 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kuk, Francis |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Performance of normal-hearing listeners on the Repeat-Recall test in different noise configurations |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 15.10.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 15.10.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: This study measured the performance of normal-hearing listeners on the Repeat-Recall Test (RRT) in two noise types (2-talker babble [2TBN] and continuous speech-shaped noise [SSN]) by two noise azimuths (0° and 180°) configurations at signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of 0, 5, 10, and 15 dB and quiet | ||
| 520 | |a DESIGN: Within-subject repeated measures | ||
| 520 | |a STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty-one listeners with normal hearing who also passed cognitive screening were tested in the sound-field with the speech stimulus presented from 0° at 75 dB SPL in 4 noise configurations. The order of SNRs, noise configurations, and RRT topic conditions was counterbalanced across listeners | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Analysis revealed that repeat scores were significantly better for 2TBN, for noise at 180°, and for high context (HC) sentences. Recall performance was significantly better for SSN and HC sentences. Listening effort ratings were higher for SSN and for noise front condition at SNR ≤ 10 dB. The 2TBN noise was tolerated longer than SSN. Performance on all measures improved with SNRs | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: These data showed performance differences among noise configurations and provided a preliminary basis for comparison with hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the RRT | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Repeat-Recall test | |
| 650 | 4 | |a noise configurations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a realistic signal-to-noise ratios | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Slugocki, Christopher |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ruperto, Neal |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Korhonen, Petri |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of audiology |d 2002 |g 60(2021), 1 vom: 21. Jan., Seite 35-43 |w (DE-627)NLM119085674 |x 1708-8186 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:60 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:21 |g month:01 |g pages:35-43 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2020.1807626 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 60 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 21 |c 01 |h 35-43 | ||