Evaluation and comparison between smartphone and photomicrography based whole slide imaging

Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care..

CONTEXT: In recent years, a new concept has emerged at the forefront of slide-based diagnosis and telepathology. This is the concept of whole slide imaging. This has very recently also been tried with smartphones using complex software for photo analysis and stitching. This study is aimed to evaluate and compare the use of Jenoptik photomicrograph camera and smartphone camera-based whole slide imaging (WSI) for various microscopic preparations and slides. The study also uses a commonly available IOS smartphone device, a commonly available phone to microscope attachment, and the most commonly used Adobe Photoshop software for all stitching purposes.

AIM: To evaluate and compare smartphone and photomicrography-based whole slide imaging.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at the Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology in Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere. The samples included in this study are 10 slides of routine hematoxylin and eosin stain slides and 10 ground section slides of teeth and bone samples. Continuous photographs of the entire slide were captured using an IOS device and a Jenoptik camera attached research microscope at 10× magnification. The photographs were stitched using Adobe Photoshop 2017 software to obtain a whole slide image. Then, two observers analyzed the whole slide image for a possible diagnosis and thus compared the efficiency of both the methods.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The statistical Chi-square test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) H test were done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 2010 Software.

RESULTS: Percentage of measure of agreement was 79.5%, 83.7% and 86.3%, 89.1% for the whole slide images taken in the smartphone and photomicrograph and analyzed by Observer 1 and Observer 2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: In this study, it can be seen that the WSI by research microscopes is better than that with a smartphone and a compound microscope but still both the methods are equally good and can be followed with accurate results.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2020

Erschienen:

2020

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:9

Enthalten in:

Journal of family medicine and primary care - 9(2020), 5 vom: 27. Mai, Seite 2319-2323

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Patil, Shruthi K [VerfasserIn]
Nair, Mukund R [VerfasserIn]
Manjunath, A B [VerfasserIn]
Mujib, B R Ahmed [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Adobe photoshop
Journal Article
Microscope
Photomicrograph
Smartphones
Whole slide imaging

Anmerkungen:

Date Revised 16.04.2022

published: Electronic-eCollection

Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE

doi:

10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_18_20

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM313297215