Comparative effects of different antibiotics on antibiotic resistance during swine manure composting
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved..
This study explored commonly-used antibiotics (lincomycin, chlorotetracycline, sulfamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacin) and their collective effects on antibiotic resistance during composting. In the first 7 days, ciprofloxacin showed the greatest influence on the physicochemical factors among the studied antibiotics; the removal of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the multiple-antibiotic treatment was significantly less than single-antibiotic treatments; especially, the largest removal of ribosomal protection genes (tetW and tetO) occurred in single ciprofloxacin treatment. In the end of composting, similar removal ratio (29.71-99.79%) of ARGs was achieved in different treatments (p greater than 0.05); Chloroflexi became the main phylum and it was closely associated with ARGs removal based on the network analysis. Potential host bacteria of ARGs varied with different antibiotics; in particular, the presence of multiple antibiotics increased potential host bacteria of ermA, sul1 and tetO. Above all, collective effects of different antibiotics led to the enrichment of antibiotic resistance in the composting.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:315 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Bioresource technology - 315(2020) vom: 15. Nov., Seite 123820 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Song, Tingting [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Anti-Bacterial Agents |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 19.08.2020 Date Revised 19.08.2020 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123820 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM312884524 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM312884524 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225145354.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123820 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1042.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM312884524 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32712514 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0960-8524(20)31092-0 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Song, Tingting |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparative effects of different antibiotics on antibiotic resistance during swine manure composting |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 19.08.2020 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 19.08.2020 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a This study explored commonly-used antibiotics (lincomycin, chlorotetracycline, sulfamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacin) and their collective effects on antibiotic resistance during composting. In the first 7 days, ciprofloxacin showed the greatest influence on the physicochemical factors among the studied antibiotics; the removal of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the multiple-antibiotic treatment was significantly less than single-antibiotic treatments; especially, the largest removal of ribosomal protection genes (tetW and tetO) occurred in single ciprofloxacin treatment. In the end of composting, similar removal ratio (29.71-99.79%) of ARGs was achieved in different treatments (p greater than 0.05); Chloroflexi became the main phylum and it was closely associated with ARGs removal based on the network analysis. Potential host bacteria of ARGs varied with different antibiotics; in particular, the presence of multiple antibiotics increased potential host bacteria of ermA, sul1 and tetO. Above all, collective effects of different antibiotics led to the enrichment of antibiotic resistance in the composting | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) | |
650 | 4 | |a Bacterial community structure | |
650 | 4 | |a Ciprofloxacin | |
650 | 4 | |a Collective effects | |
650 | 4 | |a Potential host bacteria | |
650 | 7 | |a Anti-Bacterial Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Manure |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhu, Changxiong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Xue, Sha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Binxu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ye, Jing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Geng, Bing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Lianfang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fahad Sardar, Muhammad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Na |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Feng, Shuo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Hongna |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioresource technology |d 1998 |g 315(2020) vom: 15. Nov., Seite 123820 |w (DE-627)NLM098247727 |x 1873-2976 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:315 |g year:2020 |g day:15 |g month:11 |g pages:123820 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123820 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 315 |j 2020 |b 15 |c 11 |h 123820 |