Challenges in interaction modelling with digital human models - A systematic literature review of interaction modelling approaches
Digital human models (DHM) allow for a proactive ergonomic assessment of products by applying different models describing the user-product interaction. In engineering design, DHM tools are currently not established as computer-aided ergonomics tools, since (among other reasons) the interaction models are either cumbersome to use, unstandardised, time-demanding or not trustworthy. To understand the challenges in interaction modelling, we conducted a systematic literature review with the aim of identification, classification and examination of existing interaction models. A schematic user-product interaction model for DHM is proposed, abstracting existing models and unifying the corresponding terminology. Additionally, nine general approaches to proactive interaction modelling were identified by classifying the reviewed interaction models. The approaches are discussed regarding their scope, limitations, strength and weaknesses. Ultimately, the literature review revealed that prevalent interaction models cannot be considered unconditionally suitable for engineering design since none of them offer a satisfactory combination of genuine proactivity and universal validity. Practitioner summary: This contribution presents a systematic literature review conducted to identify, classify and examine existing proactive interaction modelling approaches for digital human models in engineering design. Ultimately, the literature review revealed that prevalent interaction models cannot be considered unconditionally suitable for engineering design since none of them offer a satisfactory combination of genuine proactivity and universal validity. Abbreviations: DHM: digital human model; CAE: computer-aided engineering; RQ: research question.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:63 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Ergonomics - 63(2020), 11 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 1442-1458 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Wolf, Alexander [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Computer-aided ergonomics |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 07.05.2021 Date Revised 07.05.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1080/00140139.2020.1786606 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM31220860X |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM31220860X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225143923.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/00140139.2020.1786606 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1040.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM31220860X | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32643583 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wolf, Alexander |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Challenges in interaction modelling with digital human models - A systematic literature review of interaction modelling approaches |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 07.05.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 07.05.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Digital human models (DHM) allow for a proactive ergonomic assessment of products by applying different models describing the user-product interaction. In engineering design, DHM tools are currently not established as computer-aided ergonomics tools, since (among other reasons) the interaction models are either cumbersome to use, unstandardised, time-demanding or not trustworthy. To understand the challenges in interaction modelling, we conducted a systematic literature review with the aim of identification, classification and examination of existing interaction models. A schematic user-product interaction model for DHM is proposed, abstracting existing models and unifying the corresponding terminology. Additionally, nine general approaches to proactive interaction modelling were identified by classifying the reviewed interaction models. The approaches are discussed regarding their scope, limitations, strength and weaknesses. Ultimately, the literature review revealed that prevalent interaction models cannot be considered unconditionally suitable for engineering design since none of them offer a satisfactory combination of genuine proactivity and universal validity. Practitioner summary: This contribution presents a systematic literature review conducted to identify, classify and examine existing proactive interaction modelling approaches for digital human models in engineering design. Ultimately, the literature review revealed that prevalent interaction models cannot be considered unconditionally suitable for engineering design since none of them offer a satisfactory combination of genuine proactivity and universal validity. Abbreviations: DHM: digital human model; CAE: computer-aided engineering; RQ: research question | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Computer-aided ergonomics | |
650 | 4 | |a digital human models | |
650 | 4 | |a engineering design | |
650 | 4 | |a interaction modelling | |
650 | 4 | |a posture and movement prediction | |
700 | 1 | |a Miehling, Jörg |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wartzack, Sandro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ergonomics |d 1961 |g 63(2020), 11 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 1442-1458 |w (DE-627)NLM000108596 |x 0014-0139 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:63 |g year:2020 |g number:11 |g day:01 |g month:11 |g pages:1442-1458 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1786606 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 63 |j 2020 |e 11 |b 01 |c 11 |h 1442-1458 |