Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Extra-Articular Augmentation : A Systematic Review
Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study is to systematically review the current evidence in the literature to ascertain rates of return to play after ACLR with extra-articular augmentation (EA).
METHODS: A literature search was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they evaluated and reported on return to play after ACLR + EA; case studies and review articles were excluded. The outcomes measured focused on (1) return to play, (2) return to play at the same or higher level, and (3) timing of return to play. Qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis were performed using SPSS.
RESULTS: Overall, 19 studies met our inclusion criteria. Among patients undergoing primary ACLR, 82.8% to 100% were able to return to play, with 64% to 100% able to return at the same or higher level of play. All professional athletes were able to return to play, and 85.7% to 100% were able to return to the same level of preoperative play. The mean time to return was 5 to 11 months in those undergoing primary ACLR + EA. Among those undergoing revision ACLR, 50% to 88.4% were able to return to play, with 41.5% to 77.8% able to return at the same or higher level of play. None of the 5 studies that compared rate of return to play (at any level) between ACLR + EA and ACLR alone found a significant difference between them. However, among the 6 studies that compared rate of return to play at the same level between ACLR + EA and ACLR alone, 2 studies found a significantly higher rate of return to play with ACLR + EA.
CONCLUSION: ACLR + EA resulted in high levels of return to play in those undergoing either primary or revision ACLR. Additionally, comparative studies of patients undergoing primary ACLR with or without EA reported similarly high rates of return to play.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level I to IV studies.
| Errataetall: |
CommentIn: Arthroscopy. 2021 Jan;37(1):388-390. - PMID 33384095 |
|---|---|
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:37 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association - 37(2021), 1 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 381-387 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Hurley, Eoghan T [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 10.05.2021 Date Revised 10.05.2021 published: Print-Electronic CommentIn: Arthroscopy. 2021 Jan;37(1):388-390. - PMID 33384095 Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.arthro.2020.06.007 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM31141396X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM31141396X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225142214.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.06.007 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1038.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM31141396X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32562759 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0749-8063(20)30523-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hurley, Eoghan T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Extra-Articular Augmentation |b A Systematic Review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 10.05.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 10.05.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a CommentIn: Arthroscopy. 2021 Jan;37(1):388-390. - PMID 33384095 | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study is to systematically review the current evidence in the literature to ascertain rates of return to play after ACLR with extra-articular augmentation (EA) | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: A literature search was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they evaluated and reported on return to play after ACLR + EA; case studies and review articles were excluded. The outcomes measured focused on (1) return to play, (2) return to play at the same or higher level, and (3) timing of return to play. Qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis were performed using SPSS | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Overall, 19 studies met our inclusion criteria. Among patients undergoing primary ACLR, 82.8% to 100% were able to return to play, with 64% to 100% able to return at the same or higher level of play. All professional athletes were able to return to play, and 85.7% to 100% were able to return to the same level of preoperative play. The mean time to return was 5 to 11 months in those undergoing primary ACLR + EA. Among those undergoing revision ACLR, 50% to 88.4% were able to return to play, with 41.5% to 77.8% able to return at the same or higher level of play. None of the 5 studies that compared rate of return to play (at any level) between ACLR + EA and ACLR alone found a significant difference between them. However, among the 6 studies that compared rate of return to play at the same level between ACLR + EA and ACLR alone, 2 studies found a significantly higher rate of return to play with ACLR + EA | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: ACLR + EA resulted in high levels of return to play in those undergoing either primary or revision ACLR. Additionally, comparative studies of patients undergoing primary ACLR with or without EA reported similarly high rates of return to play | ||
| 520 | |a LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level I to IV studies | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Manjunath, Amit K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Strauss, Eric J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jazrawi, Laith M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Alaia, Michael J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association |d 1993 |g 37(2021), 1 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 381-387 |w (DE-627)NLM013996401 |x 1526-3231 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:37 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:15 |g month:01 |g pages:381-387 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.06.007 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 37 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 15 |c 01 |h 381-387 | ||