Trends and Perceptions of Electronic Health Record Usage among Plastic Surgeons
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons..
BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHRs) should help physicians stay organized, improve patient safety, and facilitate communication with both patients and fellow healthcare providers. However, few studies have directly evaluated physician satisfaction with EHR and its perceived impact on patient care. This study assessed trends and perceptions of EHR within the American plastic surgery community.
METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved survey that assessed demographics, patterns of EHR use, and attitudes toward EHR was deployed by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Member Survey Research Services. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 14.2 and QDA Miner Lite software (Version 2.0; Provalis, Montreal, Canada). Significance level was P < 0.05.
RESULTS: Among plastic surgeons who use EHR, EPIC Systems software (Epic, Verona, Wisc.) was the most common vendor, with users noting a net positive effect on the quality of care they provided to patients. Younger age and less years of experience were correlated with a more positive attitude toward EHR. Positive attitude was closely linked to shared responsibility among support staff over data entry, whereas negative attitude was tightly tied to the perceived time wasted because of EHR, followed by poor technical support and design.
CONCLUSIONS: EHR use among plastic surgeons was more common in academic-associated specialties and larger practice groups. Overall, age and practice type had weak associations with perceptions of EHR usage. On average, there were slightly more positive perceptions of EHR usage than negative. The most commonly perceived issues with EHR were wasted time and barriers to user-friendliness. These findings suggest the need for greater physician involvement in EHR optimization.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:8 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open - 8(2020), 4 vom: 19. Apr., Seite e2709 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Seu, Michelle [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 14.04.2022 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1097/GOX.0000000000002709 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM31022649X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM31022649X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225135633.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002709 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1034.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM31022649X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32440400 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Seu, Michelle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Trends and Perceptions of Electronic Health Record Usage among Plastic Surgeons |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 14.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHRs) should help physicians stay organized, improve patient safety, and facilitate communication with both patients and fellow healthcare providers. However, few studies have directly evaluated physician satisfaction with EHR and its perceived impact on patient care. This study assessed trends and perceptions of EHR within the American plastic surgery community | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved survey that assessed demographics, patterns of EHR use, and attitudes toward EHR was deployed by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Member Survey Research Services. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 14.2 and QDA Miner Lite software (Version 2.0; Provalis, Montreal, Canada). Significance level was P < 0.05 | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Among plastic surgeons who use EHR, EPIC Systems software (Epic, Verona, Wisc.) was the most common vendor, with users noting a net positive effect on the quality of care they provided to patients. Younger age and less years of experience were correlated with a more positive attitude toward EHR. Positive attitude was closely linked to shared responsibility among support staff over data entry, whereas negative attitude was tightly tied to the perceived time wasted because of EHR, followed by poor technical support and design | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: EHR use among plastic surgeons was more common in academic-associated specialties and larger practice groups. Overall, age and practice type had weak associations with perceptions of EHR usage. On average, there were slightly more positive perceptions of EHR usage than negative. The most commonly perceived issues with EHR were wasted time and barriers to user-friendliness. These findings suggest the need for greater physician involvement in EHR optimization | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cho, Brian H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pigott, Rachel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sarmiento, Samuel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pedreira, Rachel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bhat, Deepa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sacks, Justin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open |d 2013 |g 8(2020), 4 vom: 19. Apr., Seite e2709 |w (DE-627)NLM23900809X |x 2169-7574 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g day:19 |g month:04 |g pages:e2709 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002709 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 8 |j 2020 |e 4 |b 19 |c 04 |h e2709 | ||