Minithoracotomy vs. Conventional Mitral Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis : a Single-Center Analysis of 128 Patients
OBJECTIVE: To compare the in-hospital outcomes of a right-sided anterolateral minithoracotomy with those of median sternotomy in patients who received a mitral valve replacement (MVR) because of rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (RMS).
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 128 patients (34% male) with RMS between 2011 and 2015. The median age was 53 years (45; 56). The mean ejection fraction was 58.4±6.3%. All the subjects were divided into two groups - Group 1 contained 78 patients who underwent MVR via minithoracotomy (MT-MVR), while Group 2 contained 50 patients who underwent MVR via median sternotomy (S-MVR).
RESULTS: In the MT-MVR group, a mechanical prosthesis was implanted in 72% of cases, while it was implanted in 90% of cases in the S-MVR group (P=0.01). The duration of myocardial ischemia was similar (MT-MVR, 77±24 min; S-MVR, 70±18 min) (P=0.09). However, the cardiopulmonary bypass time was lower in the S-MVR group than in the MT-MVR group (99±24 min and 119±34 min, respectively) (P≤0.001). There was no difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and hospitalization period. Postoperative blood loss was lower in the MT-MVR group (P≤0.001) than in the S-MVR group. There are no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications (superficial wound infection, stroke, delirium, pericardial tamponade, pleural puncture, acute kidney insufficiency, and implantation of pacemaker). The overall in-hospital mortality was 3.9% (P=0.6).
CONCLUSION: The minimally invasive approach for RMS is feasible and has an excellent cosmetic effect without increasing the risk of surgical complications.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:35 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery - 35(2020), 2 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 185-190 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Chernov, Igor [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Coronary Artery Disease |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 13.10.2020 Date Revised 13.10.2020 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0430 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM309528038 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM309528038 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225134117.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0430 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1031.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM309528038 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32369299 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Chernov, Igor |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Minithoracotomy vs. Conventional Mitral Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis |b a Single-Center Analysis of 128 Patients |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 13.10.2020 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 13.10.2020 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: To compare the in-hospital outcomes of a right-sided anterolateral minithoracotomy with those of median sternotomy in patients who received a mitral valve replacement (MVR) because of rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (RMS) | ||
520 | |a METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 128 patients (34% male) with RMS between 2011 and 2015. The median age was 53 years (45; 56). The mean ejection fraction was 58.4±6.3%. All the subjects were divided into two groups - Group 1 contained 78 patients who underwent MVR via minithoracotomy (MT-MVR), while Group 2 contained 50 patients who underwent MVR via median sternotomy (S-MVR) | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: In the MT-MVR group, a mechanical prosthesis was implanted in 72% of cases, while it was implanted in 90% of cases in the S-MVR group (P=0.01). The duration of myocardial ischemia was similar (MT-MVR, 77±24 min; S-MVR, 70±18 min) (P=0.09). However, the cardiopulmonary bypass time was lower in the S-MVR group than in the MT-MVR group (99±24 min and 119±34 min, respectively) (P≤0.001). There was no difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and hospitalization period. Postoperative blood loss was lower in the MT-MVR group (P≤0.001) than in the S-MVR group. There are no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications (superficial wound infection, stroke, delirium, pericardial tamponade, pleural puncture, acute kidney insufficiency, and implantation of pacemaker). The overall in-hospital mortality was 3.9% (P=0.6) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: The minimally invasive approach for RMS is feasible and has an excellent cosmetic effect without increasing the risk of surgical complications | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Coronary Artery Disease | |
650 | 4 | |a Hospitalization | |
650 | 4 | |a Mini-Thoracotomy | |
650 | 4 | |a Mitral Valve Stenosis | |
650 | 4 | |a Mitral Valve-surgery | |
650 | 4 | |a Myocardial Ischemia | |
650 | 4 | |a Postoperative Complications | |
650 | 4 | |a Prostheses and Implants | |
700 | 1 | |a Enginoev, Soslan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Koz'min, Dmitry |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Magomedov, Gasan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tarasov, Dmitry |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sá, Michel Pompeu B O |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Weymann, Alexander |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhigalov, Konstantin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery |d 2015 |g 35(2020), 2 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 185-190 |w (DE-627)NLM256179859 |x 1678-9741 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2020 |g number:2 |g day:01 |g month:04 |g pages:185-190 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0430 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 35 |j 2020 |e 2 |b 01 |c 04 |h 185-190 |