Ethical Use of Public Networks and Social Media in Surgical Innovation
The use of social media among surgeons is increasing in the professional domain as a result of the benefits of rapid communication for advertising, professional development, advocacy, and innovation. Social media allows for collaboration and consultation on cases that may be difficult or uncommon, drawing on collective wisdom but also bypassing traditional privacy protections and other regulatory firewalls. The expanded access that comes with social media produces challenges, including the management of information dissemination and ensuing perceptions, the risk of biased patient/research participant recruitment, the potential for overlap between personal and professional lives, and the precarious nature of self-interest in professional social media use. The ethics of surgical innovation in the context of social media has not been extensively discussed. The nature of social media favors attention grabbing, sensationalized content. Innovation is inherently sensational and demands attention. The alignment of these intrinsic characteristics forms a basis for its appeal and contagion on social media. Despite strict regulatory clinical research environment, many surgical innovations and subsequent evolution in practice arise from a longitudinal surgical culture of trial and error that happens every day. The difficulty in distinguishing innovation from research and the precarious nature of interactions found on social media create a unique ethical dilemma to be addressed for the innovative surgeon. Therefore, the use of social media in surgical innovation thus requires a more robust ethical analysis.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:31 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A - 31(2021), 9 vom: 01. Sept., Seite 988-992 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
McNeely, Molly M [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Ethics |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 17.09.2021 Date Revised 17.09.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1089/lap.2019.0758 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM308873254 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM308873254 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225132656.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1089/lap.2019.0758 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1029.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM308873254 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32302509 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a McNeely, Molly M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ethical Use of Public Networks and Social Media in Surgical Innovation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 17.09.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 17.09.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a The use of social media among surgeons is increasing in the professional domain as a result of the benefits of rapid communication for advertising, professional development, advocacy, and innovation. Social media allows for collaboration and consultation on cases that may be difficult or uncommon, drawing on collective wisdom but also bypassing traditional privacy protections and other regulatory firewalls. The expanded access that comes with social media produces challenges, including the management of information dissemination and ensuing perceptions, the risk of biased patient/research participant recruitment, the potential for overlap between personal and professional lives, and the precarious nature of self-interest in professional social media use. The ethics of surgical innovation in the context of social media has not been extensively discussed. The nature of social media favors attention grabbing, sensationalized content. Innovation is inherently sensational and demands attention. The alignment of these intrinsic characteristics forms a basis for its appeal and contagion on social media. Despite strict regulatory clinical research environment, many surgical innovations and subsequent evolution in practice arise from a longitudinal surgical culture of trial and error that happens every day. The difficulty in distinguishing innovation from research and the precarious nature of interactions found on social media create a unique ethical dilemma to be addressed for the innovative surgeon. Therefore, the use of social media in surgical innovation thus requires a more robust ethical analysis | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a public networks | |
| 650 | 4 | |a social media | |
| 650 | 4 | |a surgical innovation | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shuman, Andrew G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vercler, Christian J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A |d 1998 |g 31(2021), 9 vom: 01. Sept., Seite 988-992 |w (DE-627)NLM093911696 |x 1557-9034 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2021 |g number:9 |g day:01 |g month:09 |g pages:988-992 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0758 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 31 |j 2021 |e 9 |b 01 |c 09 |h 988-992 | ||