MIC and Upper Limit of Wild-Type Distribution for 13 Antifungal Agents against a Trichophyton mentagrophytes-Trichophyton interdigitale Complex of Indian Origin
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology..
Dermatophytosis due to the Trichophyton mentagrophytes-Trichophyton interdigitale complex is being increasingly reported across India. Reports of therapeutic failure have surfaced recently, but there are no clinical break points (CBP) or epidemiological cutoffs (ECVs) available to guide the treatment of dermatophytosis. In this study, a total of 498 isolates of the T. mentagrophytes-interdigitale complex were collected from six medical centers over a period of five years (2014 to 2018). Antifungal susceptibility testing of the isolates was carried out for itraconazole, fluconazole, ketoconazole, voriconazole, luliconazole, sertaconazole, miconazole, clotrimazole, terbinafine, amorolfine, naftifine, ciclopirox olamine, and griseofulvin. The MICs (in mg/liter) comprising >95% of the modeled populations were as follows: 0.06 for miconazole, luliconazole, and amorolfine; 0.25 for voriconazole; 0.5 for itraconazole, ketoconazole, and ciclopirox olamine; 1 for clotrimazole and sertaconazole; 8 for terbinafine; 16 for naftifine; 32 for fluconazole; and 64 for griseofulvin. A high percentage of isolates above the upper limit of the wild-type MIC (UL-WT) were observed for miconazole (29%), luliconazole (13.9%), terbinafine (11.4%), naftifine (5.2%), and voriconazole (4.8%), while they were low for itraconazole (0.2%). Since the MICs of itraconazole were low against the T. mentagrophytes-interdigitale complex, this could be considered the choice of first-line treatment. The F397L mutation in the squalene epoxidase (SE) gene was observed in 77.1% of isolates with a terbinafine MIC of ≥1 mg/liter, but no mutation was detected in isolates with a terbinafine MIC of <1 mg/liter. In the absence of CBPs, evaluation of the UL-WT may be beneficial for managing dermatophytosis and monitoring the emergence of isolates with reduced susceptibility.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:64 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy - 64(2020), 4 vom: 24. März |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Shaw, Dipika [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Antifungal Agents |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.01.2021 Date Revised 28.01.2021 published: Electronic-Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1128/AAC.01964-19 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM306105586 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM306105586 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225122632.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1128/AAC.01964-19 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1020.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM306105586 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32015042 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)e01964-19 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Shaw, Dipika |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a MIC and Upper Limit of Wild-Type Distribution for 13 Antifungal Agents against a Trichophyton mentagrophytes-Trichophyton interdigitale Complex of Indian Origin |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 28.01.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 28.01.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. | ||
| 520 | |a Dermatophytosis due to the Trichophyton mentagrophytes-Trichophyton interdigitale complex is being increasingly reported across India. Reports of therapeutic failure have surfaced recently, but there are no clinical break points (CBP) or epidemiological cutoffs (ECVs) available to guide the treatment of dermatophytosis. In this study, a total of 498 isolates of the T. mentagrophytes-interdigitale complex were collected from six medical centers over a period of five years (2014 to 2018). Antifungal susceptibility testing of the isolates was carried out for itraconazole, fluconazole, ketoconazole, voriconazole, luliconazole, sertaconazole, miconazole, clotrimazole, terbinafine, amorolfine, naftifine, ciclopirox olamine, and griseofulvin. The MICs (in mg/liter) comprising >95% of the modeled populations were as follows: 0.06 for miconazole, luliconazole, and amorolfine; 0.25 for voriconazole; 0.5 for itraconazole, ketoconazole, and ciclopirox olamine; 1 for clotrimazole and sertaconazole; 8 for terbinafine; 16 for naftifine; 32 for fluconazole; and 64 for griseofulvin. A high percentage of isolates above the upper limit of the wild-type MIC (UL-WT) were observed for miconazole (29%), luliconazole (13.9%), terbinafine (11.4%), naftifine (5.2%), and voriconazole (4.8%), while they were low for itraconazole (0.2%). Since the MICs of itraconazole were low against the T. mentagrophytes-interdigitale complex, this could be considered the choice of first-line treatment. The F397L mutation in the squalene epoxidase (SE) gene was observed in 77.1% of isolates with a terbinafine MIC of ≥1 mg/liter, but no mutation was detected in isolates with a terbinafine MIC of <1 mg/liter. In the absence of CBPs, evaluation of the UL-WT may be beneficial for managing dermatophytosis and monitoring the emergence of isolates with reduced susceptibility | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a MIC | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trichophyton mentagrophyte | |
| 650 | 4 | |a UL-WT | |
| 650 | 4 | |a antifungal resistance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a dermatophytes | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Antifungal Agents |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Singh, Shreya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dogra, Sunil |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jayaraman, Jyothi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bhat, Ramesh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Panda, Saumya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chakrabarti, Arunaloke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Anjum, Nishat |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chowdappa, Aruna |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nagamoti, Mahantesh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Varshney, Umesh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vanam, Hari Pankaj |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Savio, Jayanthi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Antony, Meryl |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rudramurthy, Shivaprakash M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy |d 1972 |g 64(2020), 4 vom: 24. März |w (DE-627)NLM000026506 |x 1098-6596 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:64 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g day:24 |g month:03 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01964-19 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 64 |j 2020 |e 4 |b 24 |c 03 | ||