Ultrasonographic characterization of lingual structures pertinent to oral, periodontal, and implant surgery
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
OBJECTIVES: Increased applications of ridge augmentation in the lingual posterior mandible call for an urgent need to study its anatomy. Therefore, our first aim was to validate ultrasound in measuring the mandibular lingual structures in human cadavers. Secondarily, to test its feasibility in imaging the lingual nerve in live humans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine fresh un-embalmed fully/partially edentulous cadaver heads were utilized for aim 1. Three areas in the lingual mandible were imaged (mandibular premolar, molar, and retromolar). Immediately after, biopsies were harvested from each site. The thickness of the mucosa, mylohyoid muscle, and lingual nerve diameter was measured via ultrasound and statistically compared to histology. Similarly, the lingual nerve in live humans was also imaged.
RESULTS: None of the differences between the ultrasound and histology measurements reached statistical significance (p > .05). The mean mucosal thickness via ultrasound and histology was 1.45 ± 0.49 and 1.39 ± 0.50 mm, 5 mm lingual to the mylohyoid muscle attachment. At 10 mm beyond the attachment, the ultrasound and histologic values were 1.54 ± 0.48 and 1.37 ± 0.49, respectively. The mean muscle thickness measured via ultrasound and histology was 2.31 ± 0.56 and 2.25 ± 0.47 mm, at the 5 mm distance. At the 10 mm distance, the measurements were 2.46 ± 0.56 and 2.36 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. The mean ultrasonic lingual nerve diameter was 2.38 ± 0.44 mm, versus 2.43 ± 0.42 mm, with histology. The lingual nerve diameter on 19 live humans averaged to 2.01 ± 0.35 mm (1.4-3.1 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: Within its limitations, ultrasound accurately measured mandibular lingual soft tissue structures on cadavers, and the lingual nerve on live humans.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:31 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Clinical oral implants research - 31(2020), 4 vom: 05. Apr., Seite 352-359 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Barootchi, Shayan [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Alveolar ridge |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 07.04.2020 Date Revised 02.04.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1111/clr.13573 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM30524521X |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM30524521X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225120745.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/clr.13573 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1017.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM30524521X | ||
035 | |a (NLM)31925829 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Barootchi, Shayan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ultrasonographic characterization of lingual structures pertinent to oral, periodontal, and implant surgery |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 07.04.2020 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 02.04.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: Increased applications of ridge augmentation in the lingual posterior mandible call for an urgent need to study its anatomy. Therefore, our first aim was to validate ultrasound in measuring the mandibular lingual structures in human cadavers. Secondarily, to test its feasibility in imaging the lingual nerve in live humans | ||
520 | |a MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine fresh un-embalmed fully/partially edentulous cadaver heads were utilized for aim 1. Three areas in the lingual mandible were imaged (mandibular premolar, molar, and retromolar). Immediately after, biopsies were harvested from each site. The thickness of the mucosa, mylohyoid muscle, and lingual nerve diameter was measured via ultrasound and statistically compared to histology. Similarly, the lingual nerve in live humans was also imaged | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: None of the differences between the ultrasound and histology measurements reached statistical significance (p > .05). The mean mucosal thickness via ultrasound and histology was 1.45 ± 0.49 and 1.39 ± 0.50 mm, 5 mm lingual to the mylohyoid muscle attachment. At 10 mm beyond the attachment, the ultrasound and histologic values were 1.54 ± 0.48 and 1.37 ± 0.49, respectively. The mean muscle thickness measured via ultrasound and histology was 2.31 ± 0.56 and 2.25 ± 0.47 mm, at the 5 mm distance. At the 10 mm distance, the measurements were 2.46 ± 0.56 and 2.36 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. The mean ultrasonic lingual nerve diameter was 2.38 ± 0.44 mm, versus 2.43 ± 0.42 mm, with histology. The lingual nerve diameter on 19 live humans averaged to 2.01 ± 0.35 mm (1.4-3.1 mm) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Within its limitations, ultrasound accurately measured mandibular lingual soft tissue structures on cadavers, and the lingual nerve on live humans | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a alveolar ridge | |
650 | 4 | |a anatomy | |
650 | 4 | |a dental implant | |
650 | 4 | |a diagnosis | |
650 | 4 | |a ultrasonography | |
650 | 7 | |a Dental Implants |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Chan, Hsun-Liang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Namazi, Sharon S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Hom-Lay |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kripfgans, Oliver D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical oral implants research |d 1992 |g 31(2020), 4 vom: 05. Apr., Seite 352-359 |w (DE-627)NLM012715808 |x 1600-0501 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g day:05 |g month:04 |g pages:352-359 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13573 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 31 |j 2020 |e 4 |b 05 |c 04 |h 352-359 |