Blog
Feedback
schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Logo der Bibliothek

Logo FID Pharmazie PubPharm Discovery System Universitätsbibliothek Braunschweig Institut für Informationssysteme

Use of piezoelectric surgery and Er:YAG laser:which one is more effective during impacted third molar surgery?

Background: Reduction in postoperative complications is of vital considerations in impacted third molar teeth surgery. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative complications of impacted third molar surgeries for bone removal using laser, piezoelectric equipment, and conventional rotary instruments

Methods: To address the research purpose, the investigator designed the prospective double-blind clinical trial study. The sample size was determined 20 (40 teeth) by sampling formula in any kind of operation. The data of patients were obtained in the different periods in terms of pain, trismus, swelling, ecchymosis, and patient's satisfaction and then analyzed using SPSS 20 software via paired

Results: The pain immediately after surgery and 2 days and 7 days after surgery was higher in the laser group. The swelling immediately after surgery was more in the laser group but not significant. The amount of mouth opening immediately after surgery and 2 days and 7 days after surgery was significantly lower in the laser group than in the piezosurgery group. The total duration of surgery and duration of osteotomy were significantly longer in the laser group. The patient's satisfaction from surgery with piezosurgery was more than that with laser, but this difference was not significant

Conclusion: Due to the rising demand for impacted wisdom tooth surgery, the present study suggests that hard tissue laser surgery and piezosurgery can clear the future of impacted molar surgery, and these approaches are more efficient in reducing postoperative complications compared to the conventional surgeries

Year of Publication: 2019
Contained in: Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery Vol. 41, No. 1 (2019), p. 29
All journal articles: Search for all articles in this journal
Language: English
Contributors: Keyhan, Seied Omid | Author
Fallahi, Hamid Reza
Cheshmi, Behzad
Mokhtari, Sajad
Zandian, Dana
Yousefi, Parisa
Full text access:
Electronic availability is being checked...
Links: Full Text (dx.doi.org)
Keywords: Er:YAG
Journal Article
Laser
Piezosurgery
Third molar
Wisdom tooth
ISSN: 2288-8101
Note: Copyright: From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Notes: Date Revised 29.08.2019
published: Electronic-eCollection
Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
Copyright: From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
PMID:
    31448247
Physical Description: Online-Ressource
ID (e.g. DOI, URN): 10.1186/s40902-019-0212-6
more publication details ...

Associated Publications

  • Associated records are being queried...
more (+)
Internes Format
LEADER 03353nma a2200565 c 4500
001 NLM301236909
003 DE-601
005 20200220090518.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190908s2019 000 0 eng d
024 7 |a 10.1186/s40902-019-0212-6  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed20n1002.xml 
035 |a (DE-599)NLM31448247 
040 |b ger  |c GBVCP 
041 0 |a eng 
100 1 |a Keyhan, Seied Omid 
245 1 0 |a Use of piezoelectric surgery and Er:YAG laser:which one is more effective during impacted third molar surgery?  |h Elektronische Ressource 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
500 |a Date Revised 29.08.2019 
500 |a published: Electronic-eCollection 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
500 |a Copyright: From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine 
520 |a Background: Reduction in postoperative complications is of vital considerations in impacted third molar teeth surgery. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative complications of impacted third molar surgeries for bone removal using laser, piezoelectric equipment, and conventional rotary instruments 
520 |a Methods: To address the research purpose, the investigator designed the prospective double-blind clinical trial study. The sample size was determined 20 (40 teeth) by sampling formula in any kind of operation. The data of patients were obtained in the different periods in terms of pain, trismus, swelling, ecchymosis, and patient's satisfaction and then analyzed using SPSS 20 software via paired 
520 |a Results: The pain immediately after surgery and 2 days and 7 days after surgery was higher in the laser group. The swelling immediately after surgery was more in the laser group but not significant. The amount of mouth opening immediately after surgery and 2 days and 7 days after surgery was significantly lower in the laser group than in the piezosurgery group. The total duration of surgery and duration of osteotomy were significantly longer in the laser group. The patient's satisfaction from surgery with piezosurgery was more than that with laser, but this difference was not significant 
520 |a Conclusion: Due to the rising demand for impacted wisdom tooth surgery, the present study suggests that hard tissue laser surgery and piezosurgery can clear the future of impacted molar surgery, and these approaches are more efficient in reducing postoperative complications compared to the conventional surgeries 
611 2 7 |a Journal Article  |2 gnd 
655 7 |a Er:YAG  |2 gnd 
655 7 |a Laser  |2 gnd 
655 7 |a Piezosurgery  |2 gnd 
655 7 |a Third molar  |2 gnd 
655 7 |a Wisdom tooth  |2 gnd 
689 0 0 |A f  |a Journal Article 
689 0 |5 DE-601 
689 1 0 |a Er:YAG 
689 1 1 |a Laser 
689 1 2 |a Piezosurgery 
689 1 3 |a Third molar 
689 1 4 |a Wisdom tooth 
689 1 |5 DE-601 
700 1 |a Fallahi, Hamid Reza 
700 1 |a Cheshmi, Behzad 
700 1 |a Mokhtari, Sajad 
700 1 |a Zandian, Dana 
700 1 |a Yousefi, Parisa 
773 0 8 |i in  |t Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery  |g Vol. 41, No. 1 (2019), p. 29  |q 41:1<29  |w (DE-601)NLM24593264X  |x 2288-8101 
856 4 1 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0212-6  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 41  |j 2019  |e 1  |c 00  |h 29