Molecular markers in recurrent stage I, grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancers
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVES: Stage I, grade 1 endometrial cancers have low recurrence rates and often do not receive adjuvant therapy. We compared recurrent cases to matched non-recurrent controls to evaluate for molecular markers associated with higher risk of recurrence.
METHODS: A case-control study including all cases of recurrent stage I, grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancer at one institution in a ten-year period. Cases were matched to controls by age, BMI, weight and stage. Molecular testing and immunohistochemistry were performed on archival tumor specimens: microsatellite instability (MSI-H), mismatch repair status, POLE mutational status, and next-generation sequencing.
RESULTS: 15 stage I, grade 1 endometrial cancer cases with recurrent disease and available tumor specimens were identified. CTNNB1 and MSI-H were present at significantly higher rates in cases than controls (CTNNB1 60% vs. 28%, OR 3.9, 95%CI 1.1-14.7, p = 0.04 and MSI-H 53% vs. 21%, OR 4.4, 95%CI 1.1-17.0, p = 0.03). POLE mutations were found in 0% of cases vs. 7% of controls (p = 0.54). Among specimens demonstrating microsatellite stability (MSS), 100% of cases vs. 26% of controls had CTNNB1 mutations (p < 0.001). CTNNB1 wild type tumors were MSI-H in 100% of cases vs. 19% of controls (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to controls, CTNNB1 mutation is present at significantly higher rates in recurrent stage I, grade 1 endometrial cancers and is found most commonly in MSS tumors. MSI-H is also present at significantly higher rates in recurrent cases. These markers may be useful for prognostic risk stratification and adjuvant therapy decision-making in this otherwise low-risk population.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2019 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:153 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Gynecologic oncology - 153(2019), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 517-520 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Moroney, Marisa R [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 12.08.2019 Date Revised 09.12.2020 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.100 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM295326875 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM295326875 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225083423.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.100 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0984.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM295326875 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)30910249 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0090-8258(19)30273-2 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Moroney, Marisa R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Molecular markers in recurrent stage I, grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancers |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 12.08.2019 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 09.12.2020 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: Stage I, grade 1 endometrial cancers have low recurrence rates and often do not receive adjuvant therapy. We compared recurrent cases to matched non-recurrent controls to evaluate for molecular markers associated with higher risk of recurrence | ||
520 | |a METHODS: A case-control study including all cases of recurrent stage I, grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancer at one institution in a ten-year period. Cases were matched to controls by age, BMI, weight and stage. Molecular testing and immunohistochemistry were performed on archival tumor specimens: microsatellite instability (MSI-H), mismatch repair status, POLE mutational status, and next-generation sequencing | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: 15 stage I, grade 1 endometrial cancer cases with recurrent disease and available tumor specimens were identified. CTNNB1 and MSI-H were present at significantly higher rates in cases than controls (CTNNB1 60% vs. 28%, OR 3.9, 95%CI 1.1-14.7, p = 0.04 and MSI-H 53% vs. 21%, OR 4.4, 95%CI 1.1-17.0, p = 0.03). POLE mutations were found in 0% of cases vs. 7% of controls (p = 0.54). Among specimens demonstrating microsatellite stability (MSS), 100% of cases vs. 26% of controls had CTNNB1 mutations (p < 0.001). CTNNB1 wild type tumors were MSI-H in 100% of cases vs. 19% of controls (p < 0.001) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Compared to controls, CTNNB1 mutation is present at significantly higher rates in recurrent stage I, grade 1 endometrial cancers and is found most commonly in MSS tumors. MSI-H is also present at significantly higher rates in recurrent cases. These markers may be useful for prognostic risk stratification and adjuvant therapy decision-making in this otherwise low-risk population | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 4 | |a Endometrial cancer | |
650 | 4 | |a Molecular testing | |
650 | 4 | |a Risk-stratification | |
650 | 7 | |a Biomarkers, Tumor |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a CTNNB1 protein, human |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Membrane Proteins |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a TP53 protein, human |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a beta Catenin |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a EC 2.7.1.137 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a PIK3CA protein, human |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a EC 2.7.1.137 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a DNA Polymerase II |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a EC 2.7.7.7 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a POLE protein, human |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a EC 2.7.7.7 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a TPTE protein, human |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a EC 3.1.3.48 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a PTEN Phosphohydrolase |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a EC 3.1.3.67 |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Davies, Kurtis D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wilberger, Adam C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sheeder, Jeanelle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Post, Miriam D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Berning, Amber A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fisher, Christine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lefkowits, Carolyn |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Guntupalli, Saketh R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Behbakht, Kian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Corr, Bradley R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Gynecologic oncology |d 1972 |g 153(2019), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 517-520 |w (DE-627)NLM000614610 |x 1095-6859 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:153 |g year:2019 |g number:3 |g day:01 |g month:06 |g pages:517-520 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.100 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 153 |j 2019 |e 3 |b 01 |c 06 |h 517-520 |