Epidemiology of Patient Harms in New Zealand : Protocol of a General Practice Records Review Study

©Susan M Dovey, Sharon Leitch, Katharine A Wallis, Kyle S Eggleton, Wayne K Cunningham, Martyn I Williamson, Steven Lillis, Andrew W McMenamin, Murray W Tilyard, David M Reith, Ari Samaranayaka, Jason E Hall. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 24.01.2017..

BACKGROUND: Knowing where and why harm occurs in general practice will assist patients, doctors, and others in making informed decisions about the risks and benefits of treatment options. Research to date has been unable to verify the safety of primary health care and epidemiological research about patient harms in general practice is now a top priority for advancing health systems safety.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to study the incidence, distribution, severity, and preventability of the harms patients experience due to their health care, from the whole-of-health-system lens afforded by electronic general practice patient records.

METHODS: "Harm" is defined as disease, injury, disability, suffering, and death, arising from the health system. The study design is a stratified, 2-level cluster, retrospective records review study. Both general practices and patients will be randomly selected so that the study's results will apply nationally, after weighting. Stratification by practice size and rurality will allow comparisons between 6 study groups (large, medium-sized, small; urban and rural practices). Records of equal numbers of patients from each study group will be included in the study because there may be systematic differences in patient harms in different types of practices. Eight general practitioner investigators will review 3 years of electronic general practice health records (consultation notes, prescriptions, investigations, referrals, and summaries of hospital care) from 9000 patients registered in 60 general practices. Double-blinded reviews will check the concordance of reviewers' assessments. Study data will comprise demographic data of all 9000 patients and reviewers' assessments of whether patients experienced harm arising from health care. Where patient harm is identified, their types, preventability, severity, and outcomes will be coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) 18.0.

RESULTS: We have recruited practices and collected electronic records from 9078 patients. Reviews of these records are under way. The study is expected to be completed in August 2017.

CONCLUSIONS: The design of this complex study is presented with discussion on data collection methods, sampling weights, power analysis, and statistical approach. This study will show the epidemiology of patient harms recorded in general practice records for all of New Zealand and will show whether this epidemiology differs by rural location and clinic size.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2017

Erschienen:

2017

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:6

Enthalten in:

JMIR research protocols - 6(2017), 1 vom: 24. Jan., Seite e10

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Dovey, Susan M [VerfasserIn]
Leitch, Sharon [VerfasserIn]
Wallis, Katharine A [VerfasserIn]
Eggleton, Kyle S [VerfasserIn]
Cunningham, Wayne K [VerfasserIn]
Williamson, Martyn I [VerfasserIn]
Lillis, Steven [VerfasserIn]
McMenamin, Andrew W [VerfasserIn]
Tilyard, Murray W [VerfasserIn]
Reith, David M [VerfasserIn]
Samaranayaka, Ari [VerfasserIn]
Hall, Jason E [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Electronic health records
General practice
Journal Article
New Zealand
Patient harm
Retrospective studies
Safety

Anmerkungen:

Date Revised 30.03.2022

published: Electronic

Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE

doi:

10.2196/resprot.6696

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM268305412