Current situation regarding central venous port implantation procedures and complications : a questionnaire-based survey of 11,693 implantations in Japan
BACKGROUND: We conducted a nationwide questionnaire-based survey to understand the current situation regarding central venous port implantation in order to identify the ideal procedure.
METHODS: Questionnaire sheets concerning the number of implantation procedures and the incidence of complications for all procedures completed in 2012 were sent to 397 nationwide designated cancer care hospitals in Japan in June 2013. Venipuncture sites were categorized as chest, neck, upper arm, forearm, and others. Methods were categorized as landmark, cut-down, ultrasound-mark, real-time ultrasound guided, venography, and other groups.
RESULTS: We received 374 responses (11,693 procedures) from 153 centers (38.5 %). The overall complication rates were 7.4 % for the chest (598/8,097 cases); 6.8 % for the neck (157/2325); 5.2 % for the upper arm (54/1,033); 7.3 % for the forearm (9/124); and 6.1 % for the other groups (7/114). Compared to the chest group, only the upper arm group showed a significantly lower incidence of complications (P = 0.010), and multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio 0.69; 95 % confidence interval 0.51-0.91; P = 0.008) also showed similar findings. Real-time ultrasound-guided puncture was most commonly used in the upper arm group (83.8 %), followed by the neck (69.8 %), forearm (53.2 %), chest (41.8 %), and other groups (34.2 %).
CONCLUSION: Upper arm venipuncture with ultrasound guidance seems the most promising technique to prevent complications of central venous port implantation.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2016 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:21 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
International journal of clinical oncology - 21(2016), 6 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1172-1182 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Shiono, Masatoshi [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Themen: |
Antineoplastic Agents |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 11.01.2017 Date Revised 09.04.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
|---|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM26158894X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM26158894X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231224195857.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231224s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0872.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM26158894X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)27324107 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Shiono, Masatoshi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Current situation regarding central venous port implantation procedures and complications |b a questionnaire-based survey of 11,693 implantations in Japan |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 11.01.2017 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 09.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: We conducted a nationwide questionnaire-based survey to understand the current situation regarding central venous port implantation in order to identify the ideal procedure | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Questionnaire sheets concerning the number of implantation procedures and the incidence of complications for all procedures completed in 2012 were sent to 397 nationwide designated cancer care hospitals in Japan in June 2013. Venipuncture sites were categorized as chest, neck, upper arm, forearm, and others. Methods were categorized as landmark, cut-down, ultrasound-mark, real-time ultrasound guided, venography, and other groups | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: We received 374 responses (11,693 procedures) from 153 centers (38.5 %). The overall complication rates were 7.4 % for the chest (598/8,097 cases); 6.8 % for the neck (157/2325); 5.2 % for the upper arm (54/1,033); 7.3 % for the forearm (9/124); and 6.1 % for the other groups (7/114). Compared to the chest group, only the upper arm group showed a significantly lower incidence of complications (P = 0.010), and multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio 0.69; 95 % confidence interval 0.51-0.91; P = 0.008) also showed similar findings. Real-time ultrasound-guided puncture was most commonly used in the upper arm group (83.8 %), followed by the neck (69.8 %), forearm (53.2 %), chest (41.8 %), and other groups (34.2 %) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Upper arm venipuncture with ultrasound guidance seems the most promising technique to prevent complications of central venous port implantation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Central venous port | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Chemotherapy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Supportive therapy | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Antineoplastic Agents |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Takahashi, Shin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Takahashi, Masanobu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yamaguchi, Takuhiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ishioka, Chikashi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of clinical oncology |d 1997 |g 21(2016), 6 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1172-1182 |w (DE-627)NLM095566163 |x 1437-7772 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2016 |g number:6 |g day:05 |g month:12 |g pages:1172-1182 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 21 |j 2016 |e 6 |b 05 |c 12 |h 1172-1182 | ||