Primary Prevention And Health Promotion in Bavaria : Taking Stock
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York..
Background: Health promotion and prevention are key elements of Bavarian health policy and are currently being re-oriented along the framework of the "Bavarian Prevention Plan". In this context, a stock taking of prevention and health promotion in Bavaria was conducted with the aim to contribute to the continued strategic and quality-orientated development of this field. Methods: The investigation was restricted to activities of primary prevention and health promotion with a focus on the action areas of the Bavarian Prevention Plan. The prevention actors, not projects, were the smallest units that were surveyed. During the 3-month field phase in 2014/2015, 595 prevention players were contacted and asked to complete an online questionnaire on their activities and target groups as well as quality and structural aspects. In addition, 9 expert interviews were conducted in an urban and a rural area in order to explore the field of small commercial and civic prevention actors. Results: 135 prevention players took part in the survey (return rate 23%). The most commonly cited themes of activities are health literacy (62% of players) and mental health (58%). The target groups are often broadly defined, gender specific measures and those for socially disadvantaged groups are comparatively rare. Provision of health-related information is the most commonly used approach (58-69% of players depending on the action area), least used are community work approaches (9-12%). 77% of the respondents state to use models of best practice and 55% scientific results in the development of measures; 43% conduct outcome evaluations and 80% take part in committee work and networks. The latter are mainly used to exchange information (90% of actors), 55 and 54% state to use them for joint planning and delivery of interventions, respectively. Conclusions: The most important prevention players took part in the survey. Methodologically it proved difficult to achieve a meaningful depiction of central aspects of the prevention scene via a quantitative survey approach. There is a lack of well-tried instruments and approaches for such cross-agency surveys. Nevertheless, the study allows trend statements on the spectrum, structure and quality of prevention in Bavaria. Thus, a starting line for the implementation of the Bavarian Prevention Plan as well as the basis of prevention reporting as intended by the new national prevention law could be established.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2017 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:79 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) - 79(2017), 4 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 238-246 |
| Sprache: |
Deutsch |
|---|
| Weiterer Titel: |
Primärprävention und Gesundheitsförderung in Bayern – eine explorative Bestandsaufnahme |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Reisig, V [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.02.2018 Date Revised 28.02.2018 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1055/s-0042-108585 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM261505033 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM261505033 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231224195709.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231224s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1055/s-0042-108585 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0871.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM261505033 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)27315233 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a ger | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Reisig, V |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Primary Prevention And Health Promotion in Bavaria |b Taking Stock |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a Primärprävention und Gesundheitsförderung in Bayern – eine explorative Bestandsaufnahme |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 28.02.2018 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 28.02.2018 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York. | ||
| 520 | |a Background: Health promotion and prevention are key elements of Bavarian health policy and are currently being re-oriented along the framework of the "Bavarian Prevention Plan". In this context, a stock taking of prevention and health promotion in Bavaria was conducted with the aim to contribute to the continued strategic and quality-orientated development of this field. Methods: The investigation was restricted to activities of primary prevention and health promotion with a focus on the action areas of the Bavarian Prevention Plan. The prevention actors, not projects, were the smallest units that were surveyed. During the 3-month field phase in 2014/2015, 595 prevention players were contacted and asked to complete an online questionnaire on their activities and target groups as well as quality and structural aspects. In addition, 9 expert interviews were conducted in an urban and a rural area in order to explore the field of small commercial and civic prevention actors. Results: 135 prevention players took part in the survey (return rate 23%). The most commonly cited themes of activities are health literacy (62% of players) and mental health (58%). The target groups are often broadly defined, gender specific measures and those for socially disadvantaged groups are comparatively rare. Provision of health-related information is the most commonly used approach (58-69% of players depending on the action area), least used are community work approaches (9-12%). 77% of the respondents state to use models of best practice and 55% scientific results in the development of measures; 43% conduct outcome evaluations and 80% take part in committee work and networks. The latter are mainly used to exchange information (90% of actors), 55 and 54% state to use them for joint planning and delivery of interventions, respectively. Conclusions: The most important prevention players took part in the survey. Methodologically it proved difficult to achieve a meaningful depiction of central aspects of the prevention scene via a quantitative survey approach. There is a lack of well-tried instruments and approaches for such cross-agency surveys. Nevertheless, the study allows trend statements on the spectrum, structure and quality of prevention in Bavaria. Thus, a starting line for the implementation of the Bavarian Prevention Plan as well as the basis of prevention reporting as intended by the new national prevention law could be established | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kuhn, J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Loos, S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nennstiel-Ratzel, U |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wildner, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Caselmann, W H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) |d 1997 |g 79(2017), 4 vom: 13. Apr., Seite 238-246 |w (DE-627)NLM012669350 |x 1439-4421 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:79 |g year:2017 |g number:4 |g day:13 |g month:04 |g pages:238-246 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108585 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 79 |j 2017 |e 4 |b 13 |c 04 |h 238-246 | ||