Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved..
Although the cochlear implant is already the world's most successful neural prosthesis, opportunities for further improvement abound. Promising areas of current research include work on improving the biological infrastructure in the implanted cochlea to optimize reception of cochlear implant stimulation and on designing the pattern of electrical stimulation to take maximal advantage of conditions in the implanted cochlea. In this review we summarize what is currently known about conditions in the cochlea of deaf, implanted humans and then review recent work from our animal laboratory investigating the effects of preserving or reinnervating tissues on psychophysical and electrophysiological measures of implant function. Additionally we review work from our human laboratory on optimizing the pattern of electrical stimulation to better utilize strengths in the cochlear infrastructure. Histological studies of human temporal bones from implant users and from people who would have been candidates for implants show a range of pathologic conditions including spiral ganglion cell counts ranging from approximately 2% to 92% of normal and partial hair cell survival in some cases. To duplicate these conditions in a guinea pig model, we use a variety of deafening and implantation procedures as well as post-deafening therapies designed to protect neurons and/or regenerate neurites. Across populations of human patients, relationships between nerve survival and functional measures such as speech have been difficult to demonstrate, possibly due to the numerous subject variables that can affect implant function and the elapsed time between functional measures and postmortem histology. However, psychophysical studies across stimulation sites within individual human subjects suggest that biological conditions near the implanted electrodes contribute significantly to implant function, and this is supported by studies in animal models comparing histological findings to psychophysical and electrophysiological data. Results of these studies support the efforts to improve the biological infrastructure in the implanted ear and guide strategies which optimize stimulation patterns to match patient-specific conditions in the cochlea.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2011 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2011 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:281 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Hearing research - 281(2011), 1-2 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 65-73 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Pfingst, Bryan E [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Journal Article |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 24.02.2012 Date Revised 05.11.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.002 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM208555455 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM208555455 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231224004211.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231224s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.002 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0695.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM208555455 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)21605648 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pfingst, Bryan E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 24.02.2012 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 05.11.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a Although the cochlear implant is already the world's most successful neural prosthesis, opportunities for further improvement abound. Promising areas of current research include work on improving the biological infrastructure in the implanted cochlea to optimize reception of cochlear implant stimulation and on designing the pattern of electrical stimulation to take maximal advantage of conditions in the implanted cochlea. In this review we summarize what is currently known about conditions in the cochlea of deaf, implanted humans and then review recent work from our animal laboratory investigating the effects of preserving or reinnervating tissues on psychophysical and electrophysiological measures of implant function. Additionally we review work from our human laboratory on optimizing the pattern of electrical stimulation to better utilize strengths in the cochlear infrastructure. Histological studies of human temporal bones from implant users and from people who would have been candidates for implants show a range of pathologic conditions including spiral ganglion cell counts ranging from approximately 2% to 92% of normal and partial hair cell survival in some cases. To duplicate these conditions in a guinea pig model, we use a variety of deafening and implantation procedures as well as post-deafening therapies designed to protect neurons and/or regenerate neurites. Across populations of human patients, relationships between nerve survival and functional measures such as speech have been difficult to demonstrate, possibly due to the numerous subject variables that can affect implant function and the elapsed time between functional measures and postmortem histology. However, psychophysical studies across stimulation sites within individual human subjects suggest that biological conditions near the implanted electrodes contribute significantly to implant function, and this is supported by studies in animal models comparing histological findings to psychophysical and electrophysiological data. Results of these studies support the efforts to improve the biological infrastructure in the implanted ear and guide strategies which optimize stimulation patterns to match patient-specific conditions in the cochlea | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bowling, Sara A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Colesa, Deborah J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Garadat, Soha N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Raphael, Yehoash |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shibata, Seiji B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Strahl, Stefan B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Su, Gina L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhou, Ning |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Hearing research |d 1993 |g 281(2011), 1-2 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 65-73 |w (DE-627)NLM000439371 |x 1878-5891 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:281 |g year:2011 |g number:1-2 |g day:01 |g month:11 |g pages:65-73 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.002 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 281 |j 2011 |e 1-2 |b 01 |c 11 |h 65-73 | ||