Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer
Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the preoperative detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical cancer.
STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study reviewed patients with cervical cancer who had undergone both preoperative MRI and PET/CT before radical surgery, including lymphadenectomy between 2004-2008.
RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were identified, of whom 28 (33.7%) had pelvic lymph node metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting lymph node metastasis were 64.3%, 69.1%, and 67.5% for MRI, and 28.6%, 83.6%, and 65.1% for PET/CT, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristics for the MRI and PET/CT were 0.667 and 0.561, respectively (P = .013). MRI showed significantly higher sensitivity for detecting metastatic lymph nodes than PET/CT (P = .006).
CONCLUSION: MRI was more sensitive than PET/CT for detecting metastatic lymph node in patients with cervical cancer.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2010 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2010 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:203 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology - 203(2010), 2 vom: 01. Aug., Seite 156.e1-5 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Chung, Hyun Hoon [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 17.08.2010 Date Revised 21.03.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.041 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM19775953X |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM19775953X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231223211251.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231223s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.041 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0659.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM19775953X | ||
035 | |a (NLM)20435285 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Chung, Hyun Hoon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer |
264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 17.08.2010 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 21.03.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the preoperative detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical cancer | ||
520 | |a STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study reviewed patients with cervical cancer who had undergone both preoperative MRI and PET/CT before radical surgery, including lymphadenectomy between 2004-2008 | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were identified, of whom 28 (33.7%) had pelvic lymph node metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting lymph node metastasis were 64.3%, 69.1%, and 67.5% for MRI, and 28.6%, 83.6%, and 65.1% for PET/CT, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristics for the MRI and PET/CT were 0.667 and 0.561, respectively (P = .013). MRI showed significantly higher sensitivity for detecting metastatic lymph nodes than PET/CT (P = .006) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: MRI was more sensitive than PET/CT for detecting metastatic lymph node in patients with cervical cancer | ||
650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Kang, Keon Wook |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cho, Jeong Yeon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kim, Jae Weon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Park, Noh-Hyun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Song, Yong-Sang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kim, Seung Hyup |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chung, June-Key |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kang, Soon-Beom |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |d 1945 |g 203(2010), 2 vom: 01. Aug., Seite 156.e1-5 |w (DE-627)NLM000012343 |x 1097-6868 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:203 |g year:2010 |g number:2 |g day:01 |g month:08 |g pages:156.e1-5 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.041 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 203 |j 2010 |e 2 |b 01 |c 08 |h 156.e1-5 |