Essential Oils Extracted from Organic Propolis Residues: An Exploratory Analysis of Their Antibacterial and Antioxidant Properties and Volatile Profile
The industrial processing of crude propolis generates residues. Essential oils (EOs) from propolis residues could be a potential source of natural bioactive compounds to replace antibiotics and synthetic antioxidants in pig production. In this study, we determined the antibacterial/antioxidant activity of EOs from crude organic propolis (EOP) and from propolis residues, moist residue (EOMR), and dried residue (EODR), and further elucidated their chemical composition. The EOs were extracted by hydrodistillation, and their volatile profile was tentatively identified by GC-MS. All EOs had an antibacterial effect on <i<Escherichia coli</i< and <i<Lactobacillus plantarum</i< as they caused disturbances on the growth kinetics of both bacteria. However, EODR had more selective antibacterial activity, as it caused a higher reduction in the maximal culture density (<i<D</i<) of <i<E. coli</i< (86.7%) than <i<L. plantarum</i< (46.9%). EODR exhibited mild antioxidant activity, whereas EOMR showed the highest antioxidant activity (ABTS = 0.90 μmol TE/mg, FRAP = 463.97 μmol Fe<sup<2+</sup</mg) and phenolic content (58.41 mg GAE/g). Each EO had a different chemical composition, but α-pinene and β-pinene were the major compounds detected in the samples. Interestingly, specific minor compounds were detected in a higher relative amount in EOMR and EODR as compared to EOP. Therefore, these minor compounds are most likely responsible for the biological properties of EODR and EOMR. Collectively, our findings suggest that the EOs from propolis residues could be resourcefully used as natural antibacterial/antioxidant additives in pig production..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:26 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Molecules - 26(2021), 15, p 4694 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Natália Y. Ikeda [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
doi.org [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3390/molecules26154694 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ059796235 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ059796235 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240412164749.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/molecules26154694 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ059796235 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ611526881ec344448d582b9ba46e3e1d | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a QD241-441 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Natália Y. Ikeda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Essential Oils Extracted from Organic Propolis Residues: An Exploratory Analysis of Their Antibacterial and Antioxidant Properties and Volatile Profile |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The industrial processing of crude propolis generates residues. Essential oils (EOs) from propolis residues could be a potential source of natural bioactive compounds to replace antibiotics and synthetic antioxidants in pig production. In this study, we determined the antibacterial/antioxidant activity of EOs from crude organic propolis (EOP) and from propolis residues, moist residue (EOMR), and dried residue (EODR), and further elucidated their chemical composition. The EOs were extracted by hydrodistillation, and their volatile profile was tentatively identified by GC-MS. All EOs had an antibacterial effect on <i<Escherichia coli</i< and <i<Lactobacillus plantarum</i< as they caused disturbances on the growth kinetics of both bacteria. However, EODR had more selective antibacterial activity, as it caused a higher reduction in the maximal culture density (<i<D</i<) of <i<E. coli</i< (86.7%) than <i<L. plantarum</i< (46.9%). EODR exhibited mild antioxidant activity, whereas EOMR showed the highest antioxidant activity (ABTS = 0.90 μmol TE/mg, FRAP = 463.97 μmol Fe<sup<2+</sup</mg) and phenolic content (58.41 mg GAE/g). Each EO had a different chemical composition, but α-pinene and β-pinene were the major compounds detected in the samples. Interestingly, specific minor compounds were detected in a higher relative amount in EOMR and EODR as compared to EOP. Therefore, these minor compounds are most likely responsible for the biological properties of EODR and EOMR. Collectively, our findings suggest that the EOs from propolis residues could be resourcefully used as natural antibacterial/antioxidant additives in pig production. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a <i<Escherichia coli</i< | |
| 650 | 4 | |a HS-GC/MS | |
| 650 | 4 | |a <i<Lactobacillus</i< | |
| 650 | 4 | |a pig production | |
| 650 | 4 | |a feedstuff | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bee product | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Organic chemistry | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Carmen M. S. Ambrosio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Alberto Claudio Miano |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Pedro L. Rosalen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Eduardo M. Gloria |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Severino M. Alencar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Molecules |d MDPI AG, 2003 |g 26(2021), 15, p 4694 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000105902 |x 14203049 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2021 |g number:15, p 4694 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154694 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/611526881ec344448d582b9ba46e3e1d |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/15/4694 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1420-3049 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 26 |j 2021 |e 15, p 4694 | ||