Earnings Management in Companies that Missed and Beat Analyst Consensus
The aim of this study is to analyze the differences of earnings management between companies that missed and beat analyst consensus. Nonfinancial companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017–2018 and have analyst consensus data available are used as the research sample, which consist of 28 companies observed for four quarters. The final sample in the analysis consists of 94 observations (firm-quarters). The independent sample t-test is used for data analysis. Results show that companies that missed analyst consensus have greater discretionary accrual than the group of companies that beat analyst consensus. Therefore, differences in earnings management between companies that missed and beat analyst consensus exist. Companies that missed analyst consensus are more inclined to conduct earnings management in the following period. This finding opens the possibility to develop a new hypothesis in the positive accounting research framework. Keywords: Analyst Consensus; Missed and Beat; Earnings Management..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:16 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis - 16(2020), 1, Seite 60-70 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Indonesisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Ni Made Cesya Pratiwi [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
doi.org [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| doi: |
10.24843/JIAB.2021.v16.i01.p04 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ057618984 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ057618984 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230501181912.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24843/JIAB.2021.v16.i01.p04 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ057618984 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ0402a024110f43b297e37b76324998de | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a ind | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a HF5001-6182 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a HF5601-5689 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Ni Made Cesya Pratiwi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Earnings Management in Companies that Missed and Beat Analyst Consensus |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The aim of this study is to analyze the differences of earnings management between companies that missed and beat analyst consensus. Nonfinancial companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017–2018 and have analyst consensus data available are used as the research sample, which consist of 28 companies observed for four quarters. The final sample in the analysis consists of 94 observations (firm-quarters). The independent sample t-test is used for data analysis. Results show that companies that missed analyst consensus have greater discretionary accrual than the group of companies that beat analyst consensus. Therefore, differences in earnings management between companies that missed and beat analyst consensus exist. Companies that missed analyst consensus are more inclined to conduct earnings management in the following period. This finding opens the possibility to develop a new hypothesis in the positive accounting research framework. Keywords: Analyst Consensus; Missed and Beat; Earnings Management. | ||
| 653 | 0 | |a Business | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Accounting. Bookkeeping | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Dewa Gede Wirama |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis |d Universitas Udayana, 2016 |g 16(2020), 1, Seite 60-70 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000076198 |x 23031018 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:60-70 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.24843/JIAB.2021.v16.i01.p04 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/0402a024110f43b297e37b76324998de |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jiab/article/view/56848 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2303-1018 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 16 |j 2020 |e 1 |h 60-70 | ||