Trial to Compare FFR Measurement With a Non-Side-Hole Guide Catheter Vs. a Side-Hole Guide Catheter : Trial to Compare FFR Measurement With a Non-Side-Hole Guide Catheter Vs. a Side-Hole Guide Catheter

The investigators propose a single center prospective study that will assess two different strategies for measuring Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in patients undergoing clinically-indicated coronary angiography in whom FFR measurement is indicated. FFR will be measured with a non-side hole guide catheter (with the guide catheter both engaged and disengaged from the coronary ostium) and with a side-hole guide catheter (with the guide catheter both engaged and disengaged from the coronary ostium) to determine, whether measurements obtained with an engaged side-hole guide catheter are more accurate as compared with those obtained with the engaged non-side hole catheter..

Medienart:

Klinische Studie

Erscheinungsjahr:

2016

Erschienen:

2016

Enthalten in:

ClinicalTrials.gov - (2016) vom: 12. Jan. Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2016

Sprache:

Englisch

Links:

Volltext [kostenfrei]

Themen:

610
Coronary Artery Disease
Medical Condition: Coronary Artery Disease
Recruitment Status: Completed
Study Type: Interventional

Anmerkungen:

Source: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record., First posted: June 24, 2015, Last downloaded: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on June 14, 2021, Last updated: June 15, 2021

Study ID:

NCT02480569
15-033

Veröffentlichungen zur Studie:

fisyears:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

CTG001927965