Trial to Compare FFR Measurement With a Non-Side-Hole Guide Catheter Vs. a Side-Hole Guide Catheter : Trial to Compare FFR Measurement With a Non-Side-Hole Guide Catheter Vs. a Side-Hole Guide Catheter
The investigators propose a single center prospective study that will assess two different strategies for measuring Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in patients undergoing clinically-indicated coronary angiography in whom FFR measurement is indicated. FFR will be measured with a non-side hole guide catheter (with the guide catheter both engaged and disengaged from the coronary ostium) and with a side-hole guide catheter (with the guide catheter both engaged and disengaged from the coronary ostium) to determine, whether measurements obtained with an engaged side-hole guide catheter are more accurate as compared with those obtained with the engaged non-side hole catheter..
Medienart: |
Klinische Studie |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2016 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2016 |
Enthalten in: |
ClinicalTrials.gov - (2016) vom: 12. Jan. Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2016 |
---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Links: |
Volltext [kostenfrei] |
---|
Themen: |
610 |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Source: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record., First posted: June 24, 2015, Last downloaded: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on June 14, 2021, Last updated: June 15, 2021 |
---|
Study ID: |
NCT02480569 |
---|---|
Veröffentlichungen zur Studie: |
|
fisyears: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
CTG001927965 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | CTG001927965 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230425205425.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210408s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)CTG001927965 | ||
035 | |a (UBBS_Klinische_Studien)NCT02480569 | ||
035 | |a (UBBS_Klinische_Studien)15-033 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Trial to Compare FFR Measurement With a Non-Side-Hole Guide Catheter Vs. a Side-Hole Guide Catheter |b Trial to Compare FFR Measurement With a Non-Side-Hole Guide Catheter Vs. a Side-Hole Guide Catheter |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Source: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record., First posted: June 24, 2015, Last downloaded: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on June 14, 2021, Last updated: June 15, 2021 | ||
520 | |a The investigators propose a single center prospective study that will assess two different strategies for measuring Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in patients undergoing clinically-indicated coronary angiography in whom FFR measurement is indicated. FFR will be measured with a non-side hole guide catheter (with the guide catheter both engaged and disengaged from the coronary ostium) and with a side-hole guide catheter (with the guide catheter both engaged and disengaged from the coronary ostium) to determine, whether measurements obtained with an engaged side-hole guide catheter are more accurate as compared with those obtained with the engaged non-side hole catheter. | ||
650 | 2 | |a Coronary Artery Disease | |
650 | 4 | |a Medical Condition: Coronary Artery Disease | |
650 | 4 | |a Study Type: Interventional | |
650 | 4 | |a Recruitment Status: Completed | |
650 | 4 | |a 610 | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t ClinicalTrials.gov |g (2016) vom: 12. Jan. |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2016 |g day:12 |g month:01 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02480569 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_CTG | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |j 2016 |b 12 |c 01 |